SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3168)2/6/2003 9:47:11 AM
From: 4figureau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5423
 
U.S. Economy in Worst Hiring Slump in 20 Years
By DAVID LEONHARDT

The American economy has fallen into its worst hiring slump in almost 20 years, and many business executives say they remain unsure when it will end.

With economic growth having slowed to less than 1 percent in recent months, about one million people appear to have dropped out of the labor force, neither working nor looking for a job, according to government figures.



The surge in discouraged workers is the most significant since the months immediately following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and it suggests that the pain of joblessness is worsening even though the nation's official unemployment rate, which counts only people looking for work, held steady at 6 percent in December.

The lack of jobs has also slowed wage growth, so that only workers in the most affluent group are still gaining ground on inflation, ending a six-year streak of increases in buying power across the board.

"Last year, I heard a lot of people say, `Come back after the first of the year; if the economy picks up, we might hire some people,' " said Tom Koehn, 50, who lost his job in May at a manufacturer of heavy machinery in South Bend, Ind. "But so far, I haven't found anybody who's hiring."

In the last two months of 2002, the employment decline became even worse than it had been at a comparable point in the so-called jobless recovery of the early 1990's, according to recently revised statistics from the Department of Labor. The economy has lost more than two million jobs, a drop of 1.5 percent, since the recent recession began in March 2001, as layoffs have continued despite the resumption of economic growth more than a year ago. The decline was 1.3 percent at the same point in the business cycle a decade ago.

Executives are now saying they have been disappointed too many times already by the halting growth of the past year to begin hiring workers in significant numbers. Although the government is likely to report on Friday that the economy added some jobs in January, many executives are still waiting to be convinced that business has regained a solid footing after the collapse of the late-90's economic bubble.

The possibility of a war in Iraq and an increase in oil prices offers another reason for hesitation, they say. Many companies have also used new technologies and management techniques to produce more with the same number of employees.

"This is what I call the new reality," said Robert M. Dutkowsky, the chief executive of J.D. Edwards, a software maker in Denver that has kept its work force at 5,000 people for the last few years. "The environment we're operating in is what it's going to be like for a while."

In his State of the Union address last week, President Bush called the improvement of the job market his "first goal" for the coming year and asked Congress to pass a $670 billion, 10-year tax cut.

"We must have an economy that grows fast enough to employ every man and woman who seeks a job," Mr. Bush said. "With unemployment rising, our nation needs more small businesses to open, more companies to invest and expand, more employers to put up the sign that says, `Help Wanted.' "

Most economists say the tax plan and another $4 billion in help for the jobless would have only a small effect on the economy this year.

The number of companies cutting jobs has spiked since November, with AOL Time Warner, Boeing, Dow Jones, Eastman Kodak, Goodyear, J.C. Penney, McDonald's, Merrill Lynch, Sara Lee, and Verizon all announcing new layoffs. Barring a sustained rise in oil prices, however, the cuts appear likely to taper off in the coming months as the economy continues its slow recovery, most forecasters say.

The bigger problem seems to be companies' unwillingness to hire new workers. In December, the number of help-wanted advertisements in newspapers across the country fell to the lowest level in almost 40 years, according to the Conference Board, a research group in New York.

"There isn't the confidence level in business today that we need for growth," said Cinda Hallman, chief executive of the Spherion Corporation, a staffing company based in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., that places almost 400,000 people in jobs, down from 600,000 three years ago. "There's uncertainty. Companies are being much more cautious than they used to be."

The labor market began this recession tighter than it had been in 30 years, with the unemployment rate falling below 4 percent in late 2000. Even at 6 percent — its level in December, the most recent reading — the jobless rate remains lower than it was during the aftermath of most recent recessions.

But companies' reluctance to hire is causing pain in ways that the jobless rate does not measure.

nytimes.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3168)2/6/2003 9:48:58 AM
From: 4figureau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5423
 
German Jobless Rate Rises to 11 Percent
German Jobless Rate Rises to 11 Percent in January, Highest Since 1998

The Associated Press





FRANKFURT, Germany Feb. 5 —
Germany's jobless rate climbed to 11 percent in January, leaving a record 4.62 million people jobless, the country's federal labor office said Wednesday.

The new rate is up from 10.1 percent in December and is the highest since Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder started his first term in 1998.

The number of unemployed surpassed the previous high of 4.46 million in February 1999 and was up from 4.25 million jobless in December. The total is 333,000 more than a year ago.

Labor Office President Florian Gerster said the first signs of economic stabilization had yet to reach the labor market.

Economics Minister Wolfgang Clement has already warned that he doesn't expect to see the number drop below 4 million this year given the flagging economy and adverse affects due to threatening war with Iraq.

Angela Merkel, head of the opposition Christian Democrats said the numbers "surpass our worst expectations" and called on Schroeder's government to come up with a "national show of strength" to solve the problem.

The new jobless figures underlined anew the persistent difference between the more prosperous western part of the country, which had an unemployment rate of 8.8 percent, and the formerly communist east, with a 19.5 percent jobless rate.

Leading economists said the new figures show the need for far-reaching reforms to Germany's labor system, which makes German workers some of the most expensive in the world.

Also Wednesday, Germany's economic ministry announced plans to change the way it calculates its jobless rate next year to meet European Union standards.

Under the new system only those actively searching for work will be counted, according to a report Wednesday in the German daily Die Welt. Currently everyone who works fewer than 14 hours per week and is registered at the national labor offices is considered jobless.

abcnews.go.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3168)2/6/2003 10:31:15 AM
From: 4figureau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5423
 
U.S. 4th-Qtr Productivity Falls at 0.2% Rate; Costs Rise 4.8%
By Siobhan Hughes

Washington, Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. productivity dropped in the fourth quarter for the first time since the second quarter of 2001 as worker hours rose and companies curbed production in a cooling economy.

The measure of how much an employee produces for every hour worked declined at a 0.2 percent annual pace from October through December, the Labor Department said. That compared with a third- quarter increase at a 5.5 percent rate as economic growth surged. It was the first decrease since a 0.1 percent drop as the economy shrank at a 1.6 percent annual rate from April through June 2001.


``There's got to be a payback at some point,'' said Cynthia Latta, an economist at DRI-WEFA Global Insight in Lexington, Massachusetts, before the report. ``Productivity had been running at unusually high levels, and it's hard to keep growing that fast.''

For all of 2002, productivity was still up 4.7 percent, the most since 1950. That compares with gains averaging 2.5 percent a year from 1996-2000 as investments in computers and other technology resulted in greater efficiency. From 1976-95, productivity expanded at an average of 1.4 percent. The 2002 increase suggests that companies are still benefiting from new technology and the economy needs to expand at a faster rate before hiring will accelerate.

Unit labor costs, or the amount paid to a worker for each unit of production, rose at a 4.8 percent rate in the fourth quarter after a 0.1 percent rate of decline in the third quarter. It was the largest gain since an 8 percent rise in the 2000 third quarter. For all of 2002, unit labor costs fell 1.8 percent, the largest decline on record.

Higher Health Costs

``Labor compensation has accelerated in the past few quarters, reflecting pressure from health-insurance premiums, and productivity will be able to provide only a modest offset in the most recent quarter,'' said Michael Moran, chief economist at Daiwa Securities America in New York, before the report.

Economists had expected a 0.7 percent rate of increase in productivity after the third quarter's previously reported 5.1 percent rise, based on the median of 63 forecasts in a Bloomberg News survey. Economic growth in the final three months last year slowed to a 0.7 percent annual rate from 4 percent in the previous three months. Economists in the survey had expected a 3 percent rise in unit labor costs, following an initially reported decline of 0.2 percent.

Rising productivity reduces the cost of doing business and enables the economy to grow faster than once though possible without triggering an outbreak of inflation. During the boom years of the late 1990s, productivity gains meant falling unemployment. The jobless rate headed toward a 30-year low of 3.9 percent in October 2000 and profits surged.

The Dark Side

When growth slowed starting in mid-2000, workers began to experience the dark side of higher productivity. As companies took advantage of computers to operate more efficiently, managers found that they could meet existing demand without adding to payrolls.

The trend was evident as recently as the fourth quarter. The Labor Department report showed that hours worked increased at a 1 percent annual rate, the first gain since the first quarter of 2001. At the same time, output slowed to a 0.8 percent rate of increase in the fourth quarter from a 5.2 percent pace in the third quarter.

Manufacturing productivity posted gains. Productivity at the nation's factories rose at a 0.7 percent rate in the fourth quarter after increasing at a 5.5 percent rate in the third quarter.

Such gains have helped boost profits. Sprint Corp., the third- biggest U.S. long-distance telephone company, yesterday said it posted $39 million in fourth-quarter net income because it pared costs. In the year-earlier quarter, Sprint had a $1.23 billion loss.

Federal Reserve Policy

The company has shaved expenses by cutting 15,000 jobs over the past two years. In December, Sprint said it would eliminate 2,100 positions by combining parts of its long-distance, Internet and wireless units to save $145 million a year.

Federal Reserve policy makers have been citing productivity gains as a reason for little inflationary pressure, which has left the central bank the leeway to hold its benchmark overnight bank lending rate at 1.25 percent, the lowest since July 1961.

Alfred Broaddus, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, who is a voting member of the Fed's Open Market Committee, said earlier this month that the economy may enjoy a ``modest'' increase in business spending as profits recover and as rising productivity induces companies to buy new equipment and software.

quote.bloomberg.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (3168)2/6/2003 10:33:24 AM
From: 4figureau  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5423
 
California's Record Deficit Threatens Services, Jobs, Economy
By David Dietz

San Francisco, Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Officials in San Jose, California, spent five years developing a $300 million plan for housing, community centers and parking improvements that is now threatened by the state's record $34.6 billion budget deficit.

In San Bernardino County, which stretches across Southern California terrain the size of New Jersey, the libraries expect a 60 percent cut in spending for new books, to $800,000 from $2 million, said county librarian Ed Kieczykowski.

In Sacramento, the state capital, local school superintendent James Sweeney looks back three years to when California was flush with cash as he waits to find out how much money his district will lose.

``We were talking about $10 billion state surpluses, buying computers, doing all kinds of things,'' said Sweeney. ``It's absolutely incredible that in this brief amount of time we've gone from a $10 billion surplus to an astounding shortfall.''

Saddled with a budget gap triple the next largest state deficit, California's governor and lawmakers are considering raising sales, income and cigarette taxes while slashing services and jobs. Those steps will make it harder for the state to recover from a recession that has pushed unemployment to a six-year high of 6.6 percent, according to economists and officials.

``This is the most serious threat to recovery in California that I've seen in 25 years,'' said Susan Shick, executive director of the San Jose Redevelopment Agency.

By law Governor Gray Davis and the state legislature are required to balance expenses and revenue through spending cuts and tax increases. Their actions are being watched by companies that rate the credit-worthiness of state bonds.

Downgrade Fear

State officials are scheduled to meet in New York today with Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's and tomorrow with Fitch Ratings. In December, S&P and Fitch downgraded California's bonds, driving up its cost of borrowing for capital construction projects such as school and roads.

Davis said in a Bloomberg interview last night that he believes the ratings companies shouldn't downgrade the state further.

``I think that they will see that I'm serious and that I've laid out a plan to protect the state from a budgetary and cash perspective,'' Davis said.

California is scheduled to sell more than $5.4 billion of municipal bonds through the end of the year, including a $900 million general obligation debt offering on Feb. 13.

S&P reduced its rating on the state's general obligation bonds a single level to A from A+, tying the state with Louisiana for the lowest credit rating. Fitch Ratings cut its rating three levels to A from AA, saying the deficit was ``deep and continuing.'' Moody's rates the bonds A1 after two downgrades in 2001.

Increased Premium

The state's 30-year bonds yield 3/10 of a percentage point more than AAA rated municipal debt, about double the average spread over the last 13 months, according to Bloomberg data. A 30- year bond that sold in October at 101.56 cents to yield 4.8 percent dropped to 98.74 cents to yield 5.08 percent in trading Monday.

``Investors are really looking for an indication of the political will of the state to solve this problem,'' said David Blair, a senior analyst in Irvine, California, for Nuveen Investments Inc., which oversees $46 million in municipal bonds.

Davis, a Democrat, and the state legislature, which is controlled by his party, increased spending 51 percent to $80.2 billion in fiscal 2001 from $53 billion in fiscal 1998 as revenue from personal and corporate income taxes surged in the Internet and technology boom.

Rise and Fall

In 2000, receipts from taxes on capital gains and cashed-in stock options soared to $17 billion, or 25 percent of the $67 billion general fund, from $7 billion, or about 13 percent of the general fund in 1998. The state pulled in $12 billion more than it needed to pay bills.

Since March, 2000, the Standard & Poor's 500 Index has fallen almost 46 percent and capital gains revenue has plunged 72 percent to $4.7 billion.

Across the U.S., states have amassed an estimated $94 billion of deficits through the budget period ending in mid-2004 because of falling tax revenue in an economic slowdown, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

After California's deficit, New York's shortfall over that period is the largest at $11.5 billion, followed by those of New Jersey, $5.7 billion, and Texas, $5.5 billion, according to the conference.

Davis has proposed $20.6 billion in budget cuts and $8.3 billion in tax increases. He also wants to defer payments to local governments and the state pension fund, raise student tuition at public colleges and increase fees paid by Indian casinos. He has valued those measures at $5.6 billion.

Spending Cuts

The spending cuts in the governor's plan include slashing $3 billion from a health insurance program for the poor and $3 billion from school spending, as well as firing 2,000 state workers.

He has asked the legislature to approve this month cuts that will be worth $5.4 billion when the fiscal year ends June 30. He said the action would limit the state's need to borrow to repay $12.5 billion in notes due that month.

Davis's tax proposals would add a penny to the 7.25 cents per dollar sales tax to raise $4.6 billion and would collect an additional $2.6 billion from people with annual taxable incomes over $272,000. An increase in the cigarette tax to $1.10 a pack from 87 cents would raise an additional $1.2 billion.

The legislature and the governor are at odds over elements of the plan. Republicans -- who hold 15 of 40 seats in the Senate and 32 of 80 Assembly seats -- have balked at the proposed tax increases.

Legislative Battle

``New taxes will not solve the problem,'' said Assembly Republican minority leader David Cox. ``They won't get people back to work, they won't create jobs and they won't get California out of this fiscal meltdown.''

Davis's fellow Democrats have said they would cut spending as long as the governor agreed to raise car registration fees by $4 billion to help cities and counties hurt by budget reductions. Davis said Tuesday that he would veto such a measure to avoid angering Republicans. He needs their support because tax increases and the budget require two-thirds approval in both the Assembly and Senate.

Sheriffs and police chiefs in the San Francisco Bay Area said Monday at a news conference that they needed the extra car- fee money to avoid firing officers, closing jails and cutting back on investigating minor crimes.

``I'm frankly at the end of my rope,'' said Alameda County Sheriff Charles Plummer.

Call for Change

Fourteen economists at public and private universities in California yesterday urged lawmakers to reduce the state's dependence on income taxes. They recommended broadening the tax base by extending the sales tax to services and amending Proposition 13, the 1978 measure that cut property taxes, to more evenly spread the burden between homeowners and commercial property.

``We should definitely be careful not to lose sight of the longer-term reforms'' needed to avoid chronic deficits caused by economic and stock market swings, said Alan Auerbach, director of the Robert D. Burch Center for Tax Policy and Public Finance at the University of California at Berkeley.

Former Governor Pete Wilson filled a $14 billion gap in 1992 with temporary tax increases and spending cuts. Former President Ronald Reagan, who was California governor from 1967 to 1975, was booed at an Oakland Athletics baseball game in 1968 because he agreed to close a gap equal to 16 percent of the state budget with the largest tax increase in state history.

Economists said that the only options open to California in balancing its budget -- cutting spending and raising taxes -- will further crimp its economy. They also said California can't depend on economic growth to help close the budget gap.

The state has registered job losses in three of the last four months. Officials also predict some technology-related jobs may never return because companies are seeking lower labor costs by manufacturing in China and elsewhere.

``We shouldn't assume even with recovery that these problems are going to go away,'' said Janet Yellen, an economist and business professor at the University of California at Berkeley.
quote.bloomberg.com