Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (354012)	2/5/2003 12:59:57 PM
From: Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

It's a pretty unlikely scenario, but to be more realistic imagine that after 16 hours the mother realized that the cord was around the fetus neck which was now hopelessly braindamaged. It would be her decision if she wanted to continue. It would not be your decision, mine, or the clergy. You completely avoided my question. You initially stated: The child can speak for himself once sufficient mental capacity is developed In that scenario, you spoke for the child, you decided when the child could speak. I really was not interested in the likelihood of my scenario or your scenario. What I am interested in is where you draw the line. You stated a woman should be allowed to abort right up until birth. So I'll ask you again. Is it okay with you that a woman decides for whatever reason, to abort minutes before delivery?