Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alex MG who wrote (16121)	2/5/2003 7:57:18 PM
From: High-Tech East	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19219

... well said Alex ............... Ken

To: Alex MG who wrote (16121)	2/11/2003 11:19:12 AM
From: Alex MG	Respond to of 19219

1) unexpensed options are embezzlement, 2) expensing options is not "double-counting," 3) arguments against expensing options are ridiculous and insulting, 4) if CEOs really believe their own arguments about not expensing options then they need to resign immediately for the benefit of shareholders, 5) if they refuse to resign, their Board of Directors must immediately move to fire them or else the Board members are opening themselves up to being sued personally, 6) stock options are a form of private sector inflation in which CEOs are acting as central bankers, and finally, 7) all of this is very analogous and pertinent to what is happening in the economy right now. financialsense.com