Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (12676)	2/6/2003 10:22:55 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Sweep...lol...nobody voted cept the Fear Party and its 'Believers'... Democracy in America is a sick sad joke... Less than 1/10th of 1% of the population gave 83% of all campaign contributions.. and in return ... got Billions of $ in tax breaks...subsidies... and the right to exploit "Public" Lands at ridiculously low prices... Our 'Friends' at AT&T..Bristol Meyers Squib..Chase Manhatten..ENRON..Exon..GE..MSFT..Pfizer..and Phillip Morris gave $150.1 Million to the Pols Campaigns between 91-2000 and got 55 Billion in tax breaks between 96-98 alone...Not a bad investment ehh..? How is it the Corps dont have to pay taxes..yet hold such sway over Our "FREE"..<g> Elections...? Lets Try..... "No Representation ..Without..Taxation" T- Party Time Bro... And yes another possible Sweep is in the Making Pres Cheney+Rumsfeld are working on a New War Front circa 2004.. Count on it T@Impeach Bush-Cheney Now.com

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (12676)	2/6/2003 10:51:34 PM
From: portage	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Old news, Jimbo. Just like the Gingrich "revolution" in '94. Two years later, Clinton whaled on Dole. One party domination overreaches (especially when it's the repubs, it's their natural tendency). People who weren't paying attention wake up and decide it's gone far enough. It's the opposite of what you're saying. Bush is out in '04. The path of your economic analyses only strengthens this argument. Unless we get nuked in the meantime. Then all bets are off. But I'm not even going there.