SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Conolog Cp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jjs64 who wrote (393)2/16/2003 7:18:54 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 428
 
Form Type S-1/A  Filing Date 11/7/1996 Hartley T. Bernstein, Esq.

Bernstein & Wasserman, LLP



As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 1996

Registration No. 333-14247

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Conolog Corporation
(Name of issuer in its charter)

Delaware 3679 52-0853566
- ------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------
(State or other juris- (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
diction of organization) Classification Code No.) Identification No.)



5 Columbia Road

Somerville, NJ 08876

(908) 722-8081

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)

Robert S. Benou, President

Conolog Corporation

5 Columbia Road

Somerville, NJ 08876

(908) 722-8081

(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)

Copies to:

Hartley T. Bernstein, Esq.

Bernstein & Wasserman, LLP

950 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

(212) 826-0730
(212) 371-4730 (Fax)



To: jjs64 who wrote (393)2/16/2003 7:21:54 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 428
 
Re: 2/16/03 ARTLEY T. BERNSTEIN- NY Times: Penny-Stock Fraud, From Both Sides Now
Penny-Stock Fraud, From Both Sides Now
By DIANA B. HENRIQUES

ARTLEY T. BERNSTEIN spends his days exploring the piranha-infested shoals of the penny-stock market, where cheap, thinly traded stocks can be rigged to generate enormous profits for insiders.

In a spare bedroom of his eight-room Georgian-style apartment on Park Avenue in Manhattan, he searches the Internet for clusters of seemingly unrelated companies that use the same obscure accountants, lawyers and underwriters, and share the same mysterious offshore investors. He looks for flaws, fibs and fantasies in corporate documents — like one company's plan to sell stock and use it to take over AOL Time Warner, AT&T, General Electric and, for good measure, General Motors. Then Mr. Bernstein posts his conclusions on StockPatrol.com, his Web site, to warn investors away.

Some of his most faithful readers are market regulators. Following his road maps, federal investigators have found and shut down frauds they might have missed. Occasionally, he tips regulators in advance, before his targets realize that he is on their trail. One prosecutor called his assistance "singular."

His cooperation has helped the government build criminal cases against at least 34 people.

Mr. Bernstein is so good at what he calls "connecting the dots" of complicated penny-stock frauds for one good reason: five years ago, he was a formidable dot himself.

Through his law firm, Bernstein & Wasserman, he worked for some of the most notorious penny-stock manipulators of the past two decades: Stratton Oakmont, Biltmore Securities and Sterling Foster. He also worked for a host of forgettable little companies whose stocks those firms manipulated.

But in reality, he worked for Randolph Pace — a wily Wall Street veteran who, with Meyer Blinder and Robert E. Brennan, make up what one lawyer has called "the three tenors of the penny-stock world." (Mr. Blinder was jailed for securities fraud in 1992, after the collapse of his firm, Blinder, Robinson & Company. Mr. Brennan, the smiling force behind the equally infamous First Jersey Securities, is serving a nine-year prison term after being convicted of fraud in 2001.)

What makes Mr. Bernstein's apparent turnaround remarkable is its rarity. Recidivism is so common in the penny-stock world that some law enforcement experts are instinctively skeptical of anyone who claims to have left its temptations behind.

But several prosecutors and regulators have been persuaded by Mr. Bernstein, a small, dark, boyish-looking man of 51 who began to cooperate with the government in the fall of 1998. He spent hundreds of hours coaching investigators on how to decipher Mr. Pace's complex deals. He confirmed information from other sources and "gave the government sufficient confidence" to seek an indictment against Mr. Pace in November 1998, one prosecutor said.

The government later expanded its case to include two additional penny-stock firms and several new defendants. Mr. Bernstein also provided background information about Stratton Oakmont's deals with the shoe designer Steve Madden, who pleaded guilty to fraud and money laundering in 2001 and was sentenced last spring to 41 months in prison.

In May 1999, Mr. Bernstein, too, pleaded guilty to securities fraud, conspiracy and perjury and agreed to forfeit $850,000 in illegal profits. He prepared to testify when Mr. Pace came to trial on charges of secretly controlling Sterling Foster and prospering from its roughly $200 million in fraudulent business. That did not become necessary. Mr. Pace pleaded guilty in 2000 and last April and was ordered to pay nearly $135 million in restitution to investors and was sentenced to eight years and four months in prison.

By the time Mr. Bernstein pleaded guilty, his career was in ruins. He had been disbarred. His law partners had walked out on him. He could not seek a new job while he faced prison, but he was desperate to keep busy.

In July 1999, after carefully sounding out his own lawyer and the government, he started StockPatrol, which he saw as a logical extension of the guidance he had been providing to investigators. He began by scanning hyberbolic chat groups and e-mail messages on the Internet for the latest hot penny-stock tip. Then he would scour the touted company's public paperwork, looking for red flags.

The found them — and regulators paid swift attention. Following are a few examples:

• On Jan. 31, 2000, he published the first of several articles questioning whether Wellness Universe, a small health services company, was really the target of a $1 billion takeover bid, as it claimed. Eleven days after the first article, regulators halted trading in the shares, and three months later, the company's founder, George Pappas, was indicted in Manhattan. In January 2001, Mr. Pappas pleaded guilty to charges that he concocted a phony takeover to drive up the stock price so he and his family could sell for a quick profit of $2.3 million. He is awaiting sentencing.

• On March 4, 2001, Mr. Bernstein advised regulators that he would be running an article the next day about the Ives Health Company, a little Oklahoma concern that claimed to have a new AIDS drug. On the next day, regulators halted trading and, a month later, the company and its founder, M. Keith Ives, were indicted in Manhattan on federal conspiracy and wire fraud charges. Mr. Ives denies the charges and is scheduled for trial in June.

• In September 2002, Mr. Bernstein questioned the growth prospects claimed by the Vector Holdings Corporation, whose primary business was a stuffed-potato booth at a Florida shopping mall. A month later, the Securities and Exchange Commission accused the company, its president and its transfer agent of violating securities laws — in part for not disclosing that the president, Allen E. Weintraub, had a criminal record. Mr. Weintraub and the companies have settled the cases without admitting wrongdoing, but the penalties have yet to be determined..

When Mr. Bernstein came before Judge Loretta A. Preska in Federal District Court in Manhattan for sentencing in June, the many letters submitted on his behalf included one from Cameron K. Funkhouser, a vice president of the NASD's regulatory arm. Speaking only for himself, Mr. Funkhouser cited his "very positive relationship" with Mr. Bernstein, adding, "My office has opened several successful cases" based on his leads.

Richard D. Owens, the assistant United States attorney who prosecuted Mr. Bernstein, also cited StockPatrol at the hearing, but added that when Mr. Bernstein first came to the government, "we, of course, raised our eyebrows a bit."

And no wonder. Mr. Owens knew that operating a "fraud detection" site is hardly an untainted concept. One notable effort, StockDetective.com, foundered two years ago after its parent company was found by federal prosecutors to have been the target of a stock manipulation scheme. And in May, a stock adviser, Amr Ibrahim Elgindy — whose Web sites, insidetruth.com and anthonypacific.com, promised to expose penny-stock schemes — was indicted in Brooklyn on federal charges of operating a stock manipulation and extortion racket. He denies the charges and is scheduled for trial in June.

But Mr. Owens told Judge Preska that he was impressed by Mr. Bernstein's effort. "Whatever doubts we had about his motives or his purposes or his intents have quickly fallen away," he said.

Judge Preska added her own endorsement. "You have used your time and your talent in a way to help investors avoid just the sorts of things that you had previously used your time and talents to impose," she said. "I applaud you for your work." She sentenced him to two years' probation.

His quiet days running StockPatrol bear almost no resemblance to his life as an adviser to Mr. Pace's raucous empire. Like Mr. Blinder and Mr. Brennan, Mr. Pace was an intelligent, urbane, charming rogue. He survived many regulatory cases over the years and continued to prosper even after his firm, Rooney Pace, was expelled from the securities industry in 1988.

By then, Mr. Pace's business was thoroughly intertwined with Mr. Bernstein's law practice. After graduating from Columbia and the New York University Law School, Mr. Bernstein worked at two midsize firms in Manhattan and spent a few idealistic years on the city's special narcotics prosecution squad. But in 1982, at the age of 30 — "just young enough not to be afraid," he said — he set up on his own. A lawyer he knew had become general counsel for Rooney Pace and had tossed a bit of business to the eager Mr. Bernstein.

By the mid-1980's, Rooney Pace was nearly a quarter of his growing firm's business. Did Mr. Pace's reputation worry him? "I did not really see the penny-stock world as separate from the real world," he said. "I had customers who had problems with Shearson brokers or Merrill Lynch brokers that cost them far more money than some of my cases for Rooney Pace involved."

Even after Rooney Pace closed in late 1987, Mr. Pace's friends hired Mr. Bernstein. As the 1990's opened, Bernstein & Wasserman was growing like a weed.

Those were lavish, lunatic days. Mr. Pace and his friends "lived to party," Mr. Bernstein recalled.

"They had `boys' nights out' that would go on for weeks," he added.

There were binges at elegant restaurants, junkets to lush resorts, shopping sprees at Armani, recuperative weeks at some palm-studded spa.

Occasionally, Mr. Bernstein and his wife, Debra L. Cherney, were invited along. One New Year's Eve, they joined the Paces and three other couples for a Broadway show and dinner at Nobu, a top Manhattan restaurant. Another day, Mr. Bernstein was suddenly invited to join Mr. Pace's entourage for a private-jet excursion to Atlantic City.

Through it all, Mr. Bernstein said, he still thought of himself as an ethical person who just happened to represent "a bunch of people who were scoundrels." He concedes, "My business was so completely dependent on this group of clients — I was blinded by that."

Joel M. Cohen, a former federal prosecutor who worked on cases involving Stratton Oakmont, recalls his frustration with Mr. Bernstein's myopia. "Hartley was described by insiders as a `player,' somebody who, in one way or another, understood the game, knew the rules and went along with them," he said. "He was living in denial; he really was."

Even when government pressure forced Sterling Foster to close in 1997, Mr. Bernstein still felt immune. "My impression, looking back, is that Randy Pace tried to keep me at arm's length from anything that was actually unlawful," he said, almost wistfully.

But closing one eye to Mr. Pace's unsavory past clearly affected Mr. Bernstein's depth perception. He invested in several fraudulent deals and lied about those deals to regulators. He had crossed the line.

One afternoon in September 1997, he learned that several of Mr. Pace's friends were striking deals with prosecutors and talking — about him. Shocked and frightened, he hired a lawyer, Scott A. Edelman of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy.

Looking back now, his days in the Pace empire seem to him to have occurred a lifetime ago — one specific lifetime ago: that of his daughter, Raine. She was born on Dec. 17, 1997, shortly after her father came under investigation, and died on June 3, 2001, of what is believed to have been an asthma-related seizure.

"When all this happened with Hartley, we thought it was the end of the world," mused his wife, herself a lawyer, the family breadwinner and a loyal defender of her husband's essential decency. "But I remember thinking that day: I thought I had problems — I didn't know what a real problem was."

They are both active in bereavement support groups and still hope for a family. Mr. Bernstein, meanwhile, says he is exploring ways to turn StockPatrol into a profitable, but still lawful, venture — perhaps by expanding it into a radio program or a book.

His admirers among the enemies of penny-stock fraud say they are confident that Mr. Bernstein's redemption is genuine and that he will resist future temptations. But even they cannot explain why he can see so clearly now what he could not see for so long: the dots that add up to fraud.

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company



To: jjs64 who wrote (393)4/7/2003 7:35:59 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 428
 
COURT GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT CAROL MARTINO FOR ILLEGAL
BROKERAGE ACTIVITIES AND MARKET MANIPULATION; ORDERS MARTINO TO DISGORGE
$4.416 MILLION, AND ORDERS HER HUSBAND TO TURN OVER A $2 MILLION YACHT
PURCHASED WITH PROCEEDS OF MARTINO'S ILLEGAL BROKERAGE ACTIVITIES

The Commission announced the issuance of an Order dated April 4 by U.S.
District Judge Milton Pollack granting summary judgment in favor of the
Commission and against defendant Carol C. Martino and her former stock
brokerage firm (CMA Noel, Ltd.), holding them liable for engaging in
illegal brokerage activities during the period 1992 through 1995, and
further holding Martino liable for engaging in a 1993 scheme to
manipulate the stock price of RMS Titanic, Inc. (a company that
attempted to salvage artifacts from the sunken ocean liner). The Court
awarded the Commission disgorgement of Martino's illegal brokerage
revenues ($4.416 million), plus prejudgement interest of $3,386,842.92,
and other equitable relief. The Court further ordered Martino's
husband, relief defendant Gerard Haryman, and his company, defendant JTM
Ltd., to turn over to a court-appointed receiver a $2 million luxury
yacht that Martino had purchased with proceeds of her illegal brokerage
activities. The Court granted summary judgment following a hearing on
the matter held on March 17, 2003.

The Commission sued Martino and CMA in May 1998 for repeated violations
of a 1992 Commission order that barred Martino from acting as a stock
broker, and for engaging in such activities without registering as a
broker with the Commission (in violation of the federal securities
laws). The Commission had barred Martino based upon her prior
fraudulent activities as Executive Vice President of Wellshire
Securities, Inc., a retail brokerage firm. In its April 2 ruling, the
Court found that, from 1992 through 1995, Martino "willfully violated
the Bar Order" by illegally brokering millions of dollars in sales of
stock by several U.S. companies to foreign purchasers. The Court
further found that Martino thus accumulated illegal brokerage
commissions and fees totaling at least $4.416 million. The Court
ordered Martino to disgorge that sum to the Commission, plus prejudgment
interest on that amount (accrued from Dec. 31, 1995 to the present).

The Commission further charged Martino with engaging in a scheme (along
with defendant Paul Montle) to manipulate the stock price of RMS
Titanic, Inc., one of Martino's U.S. brokerage clients. The Court found
that Martino and others employed several manipulative devices to
maintain and increase artificially Titanic's stock price during the
Spring and Summer of 1993. Martino personally participated in the
scheme by (1) "agreeing [with other Titanic shareholders] to control and
order their sales of Titanic stock into the marketplace"; (2)
"guaranteeing" Titanic's principal market maker "purchasers for his
Titanic stock"; and (3) "paying brokers to influence their clients to
purchase Titanic stock." The Court previously held defendant Paul
Montle liable as well for this scheme.

The Commission also charged Martino's husband, Gerard Haryman, and his
company JTM, Ltd., with helping Martino to hide her illegal brokerage
revenues through the purchase of a $2 million yacht called "Je T'aime."
In granting the Commission summary judgment on this charge, the Court
found that "Martino purchased the yacht in November 1997 in an attempt
to hide her assets from creditors." The Court further found that,
although the yacht nominally was held by JTM, "Martino had unfettered
access to the Yacht since the date of purchase," and "[n]o legitimate
claim to the Yacht exists upon which Haryman or JTM might rely."
Consequently, the Court ordered Haryman and JTM "to turn over the Yacht
or its proceeds to a court-appointed receiver as partial payment of the
disgorgement figure imposed on Martino and CMA."

In addition, the Court permanently enjoined Martino and CMA from future
violations of the federal securities laws.

On Jan. 7, 2002, in a separate criminal proceeding brought by the U.S.
Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Martino pled guilty to
three counts of personal income tax evasion and three counts of falsely
subscribing to corporate returns. The indictment in the criminal action
includes charges that Martino failed to disclose certain income,
including illegal brokerage revenue that was the subject of the
Commission's civil enforcement action against her. In April 2002,
Martino received a twenty-eight month sentence, which she began serving
at a federal detention center in Miami, Florida. On Dec. 12, 2002, due
to a serious illness, Martino was released from prison and is presently
on supervised-release. [SEC v. Carol C. Martino, et al., 98 Civ. 3446,
SDNY] (LR-18072)



To: jjs64 who wrote (393)5/6/2003 3:30:55 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 428
 
re:Richard Molinsky->SEC BARS SIX FORMER D.H. BLAIR BROKERS FROM THE SECURITIES INDUSTRY

On May 5, the Commission issued an order barring six former stockbrokers
at now-defunct broker-dealer D.H. Blair & Co., from associating with any
broker or dealer. The six individuals - Robin Breitner, John DiBella,
Raymond Hernandez, Richard Molinsky, Richard Smith and Richard Gaydos -
consented to the issuance of the order, which was based on criminal
convictions obtained by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office after
an investigation by that office and the Commission staff. Each of the
six brokers pleaded guilty to and was convicted of at least one count of
violating the Martin Act - the New York state general business law - for
market manipulation and fraudulent sales practices. People of New York
v. D.H. Blair, et al., Ind. No. 3282/00.

In connection with their pleas, the six brokers were sentenced to
probation and five of them paid a total of $1,987,500 in restitution to
defrauded investors. Specifically, Breitner paid $175,000, DiBella paid
$40,000, Gaydos paid $97,500, Molinsky paid $1,500,000, and Smith paid
$175,000. In addition, each of the six brokers was required to perform
between 1,200 and 1,500 hours of community service.

Last December, in separate administrative proceedings, the Commission
revoked D.H. Blair & Co.'s broker-dealer registration and barred four
former D.H. Blair officers -Kenton Wood, Alan Stahler, Kalman Renov and
Vito Capotorto - from associating with any broker or dealer. See Rels.
34-47070, 34-47071, 34-47072, 34-47074, and 34-47073. (Rel. 34-47797;
File No. 3-11105)



To: jjs64 who wrote (393)7/9/2003 9:53:06 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 428
 
MAYBE THIS NEW CON-O-LOG REVERSE SPLIT WILL WORK TO INCREASE SHAREHOLDER VALUE. LOL

===========================================

Conolog Announces Results of Annual Shareholders' Meeting

SOMERVILLE, N.J., July 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Conolog Corporation (Nasdaq:CNLG) announced the results of its annual meeting of shareholders held on Wednesday, June 25, 2003. A total of 1,070,084 shares were voted.

The following directors were elected to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified: Robert Benou, Marc Benou, Arpad Havasy, Louis Massad, Edward Reilly and Graham Edwards.

In addition, shareholders approved the amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to give effect to a one-for-two reverse split of the common stock of Conolog Corporation, the granting of an aggregate of 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock to its officers and/or directors and the Company's selection of Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & Company as the Company's independent auditors for the 2003 fiscal year.

Conolog President Marc Benou commented, "We are pleased with the results of the meeting. By approving the Company's proposals, our shareholders confirmed their confidence in Conolog and its management."

About Conolog Corporation

Conolog Corporation provides engineering and design services and technical personnel placement to a variety of industries, government organizations and public utilities nationwide. The Company's INIVEN division manufactures a line of digital signal processing systems, including transmitters, receivers and multiplexers.

Contact: Conolog Corporation: Robert Benou, Chairman, 908/722-8081; National Financial Network, Geoffrey Eiten, Investor Relations; 781/444-6100, ext. 613 or email geiten@nfnonline.com, or visit www.nfnonline.com/cnlg.

Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, continued acceptance of the Company's products, increased levels of competition, new products introduced by competitors, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SOURCE Conolog Corporation

CO: Conolog Corporation

ST: New Jersey

SU:

Web site: conolog.com

prnewswire.com

07/01/2003 13:23 EDT



To: jjs64 who wrote (393)10/14/2004 4:51:45 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 428
 
Geoff Eiten was also IR for Stem Genetics. Since Geoff has been shy in updating Stem Genetic investors lately web.archive.org /with all the investigations going on I herebye present the following up date:

FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED AGAINST GINO CARLUCCI AND G&G CAPITAL

On October 6, a Final Judgment was entered against Gino Carlucci
(Carlucci) and G&G Capital, LLC (G&G), a limited liability company
controlled by Carlucci. Carlucci and G&G were permanently enjoined from
future violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities
laws and ordered to pay disgorgement of $1,012,453.00 plus prejudgment
interest thereon together with a civil penalty of $1,076,486.31.
Carlucci was also enjoined from future violations of the issuer
reporting and officer certification provisions of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and placed under officer-director and penny stock
bars. Finally, Carlucci and G&G were ordered to dismiss an adversary
proceeding they had filed against the Commission in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona.

In October 2003, the Commission filed a complaint, in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Utah, against twenty-one individuals and
entities involved in a scheme to sell securities in five United States-
based microcap issuers to hundreds of investors located primarily in the
United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand through a boiler room located
in Vientiane, Laos. In that action, the Commission obtained an order
which, among other things, froze the assets of a number of defendants,
including Carlucci. On March 17, 2004, the Court found Carlucci and G&G
in contempt of the order freezing Carlucci’s assets.

The Final Judgment, to which the defendants consented without admitting
or denying the allegations of the Commission’s complaint, specifically
enjoins Carlucci and G&G from future violations of Section 10(b) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 17(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933 and orders Carlucci and G&G to pay
disgorgement of $1,012,453.00, together with prejudgment interest
thereon in the amount of $64,033.31, and a civil penalty of
$1,076,486.31.

The Final Judgment also enjoins Carlucci from future violations of Rule
13a-14 under the Exchange Act and from aiding and abetting violations of
Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-11, and 13a-13
thereunder. The judgment also bars Carlucci from acting as an officer
or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered
pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or that is required to file
reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act as well as barring
Carlucci from participating in any offering of penny stock. [SEC v.
David M. Wolfson, et al., Docket No. 2:03 CV-00914 DAK, USDC, D. Utah]
(LR-18930)