Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (354887)	2/6/2003 12:42:46 PM
From: PROLIFE	Respond to of 769670

Why continue on your track of idiocy...do you actually like wallowing in your stupidity?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (354887)	2/6/2003 12:49:37 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That's what makes birth a good point for the legal definition. It is early enough that that conciousness has not occurred and it is a very well defined event that it hard to mistake or fake. You merely here treat birth as you ought to treat conception. You claim here that as long as the nine-month old child is inside his mother, he is not human. But should a second later he issue from the womb, then he magically becomes human. It is precisely this sort of elasticity in sanity and integrity of people who claim to follow science, that causes me to reject their pronouncements outright.