Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shack who wrote (65515)	2/6/2003 1:01:43 PM
From: NOW	Respond to of 209892

i saw .63 but cannot verify

To: Shack who wrote (65515)	2/6/2003 1:17:48 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

I think Paul Shread has been keeping it by subtracting out the leap 05 and 04 QQQ's that traded.

To: Shack who wrote (65515)	2/6/2003 1:44:24 PM
From: bcrafty	Respond to of 209892

Shack "amateurs" I agree And they're probably wigglers, too. By no means do I consider myself a "pro" but I considered for a long time whether to incorporate intraday P/C into my trading strategy, and I decided not to. I've been trying to figure out for an even longer time why so many people pay such close attention to this sentiment indicator. It probably has more instances of indicator failure than the vast majority of all other popular indicators. I'm not trying to disparage those who use it, but nobody has made its usefulness (stand-alone or otherwise) clear to me on an intraday basis or otherwise.