Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5855)	2/6/2003 2:35:33 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 25898

Really...where's the smoke???....doesn't look like you laid a glove on it to me.... JLA

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5855)	2/6/2003 2:46:49 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Only by you.

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5855)	2/6/2003 8:10:17 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 25898

Once again you reveal your utter contempt for the suffering Iraqi people. It's very shitty of you to attack a man complaining about his people's oppression at Saddam's hands. As I said before: siliconinvestor.com "The editorial dealt with Saddam's ongoing persecution of the Iraqi people, called for his overthrow and for democracy for Iraq. He also criticized the peace movement for their current lack of humanitarian concern for the Iraqi people. You have no argument against the main theme of the piece so you've focused on one sentence which mentioned in passing the Iraqi monarchy and use that to try to shift the debate to things that happened decades ago."

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5855)	2/6/2003 8:10:45 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 25898

Once again you expose your utter contempt for the suffering Iraqi people. Repeating myself: siliconinvestor.com The editorial dealt with Saddam's ongoing persecution of the Iraqi people, called for his overthrow and for democracy for Iraq. He also criticized the peace movement for their current lack of humanitarian concern for the Iraqi people. You have no argument against the main theme of the piece so you've focused on one sentence which mentioned in passing the Iraqi monarchy and use that to try to shift the debate to things that happened decades ago.