Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Overture (OVER) formerly (GOTO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnny_Blaze_420 who wrote (296)	2/6/2003 4:30:47 PM
From: Brasco One	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 429

no sell the mother f pig. sell the pos...lol!! btw northwest will take you to amsterdance from la for $300..

To: Johnny_Blaze_420 who wrote (296)	2/6/2003 11:41:56 PM
From: Ryan Bartholomew	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 429

Good try, Johhny, but actually premises (assumptions as you referred to them) are part of logic. Attacking any part of my logic would be fine, but an ad hominem attack simply demonstrates Donny's lack of education. In any case, it looks like I lost about $3K so far (still two weeks till expiration) on this one. Yes, I was wrong this time. I admit it when I am (and I rarely have been wrong regarding Overture, despite Donny's gratuitous assertions to the contrary.) So... what are your positions now? Johhny, you said you are out. Donny, I would love to know your position but as usual I am sure you won't state it. The fact that Overture did not release any significant bad new and in fact beat the forecast by a penny only strengthens my notion that this is a short-term undervaluation. I will be Feb 20 calls tomorrow morning to leverage even higher, and of course I am still long the shares I purchased in the low teens. Johnny Blaze Wrote: in defense on brasco: ryan you said, <!> he will humiliate himself by attempting to attack me instead of my logic regarding OVER<!> that is a incorrect statement in itself. he not attacking you. and he should not attack your logic, as your logic is correct. your ASSUMPTIONS are not and that is what he is attacking.