Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brian1501 who wrote (160244)	2/6/2003 6:00:23 PM
From: jjayxxxx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579060

How many inspectors are there, something like 200? I think we should do like the French say, but instead of tripling the number of inspectors, we should increase their number by about a 1000-fold. Oh, and arm them with guns. That is about the only way 'inspections' will work, IMHO. JJ

To: brian1501 who wrote (160244)	2/7/2003 1:07:38 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579060

You can't be serious. So you are one of those that thinks everything in Powell's presentation to the UN is fake? Otherwise I don't see how you could come to the conclusion that containment with inspections works in Iraq. I don't think Powell's pictures are fake. And I also think his speculation as to what's going on in the pics is reasonable......but if someone asked me in a court of law do I think Powell provided hard evidence/a smoking gun I would have to answer no. What he did do was provide enough damning evidence that the Sec. Council can't ignore the argument of the hawks. He was even making new bio agents while the inspectors were in town! I missed that one so I went back over the transcript. You'll have to point out to me where in Powell's speech that comment was made. ted