Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (65597)	2/7/2003 11:33:40 AM
From: the-phoenix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Let me give it a try: From what little I know, they suck <G>. Your mid-tine starting points (to the left on the chart) should be at some major pivot, as should the anchor points at the base of the forks for the upper and lower tines.

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (65597)	2/10/2003 9:31:35 AM
From: Jack of All Trades	Respond to of 209892

Sorry for the late reply. Based on std pitchfork rules the only one the looks to be drawn correctly is the CompX steep downward fork. Std Forks use sometype of high/low/high or low/high/low for where to draw the handle and outer tines. Then you have modified version of the std that are called "inside" and "modified Schiff" Someday I'll make a drawing and post how to correctly setup all three. But as in the use of forks, what ever describes price go with it...