Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (160315)	2/7/2003 12:23:49 PM
From: jjayxxxx	Respond to of 1579831

Agreed. They should have called it 'verification' rather than 'inspection' and referred to it that way right in the language of 1441 and all subsequent press releases, etc. That way, even if it still isn't the perfect terminology, it is still different, and requires someone to ask what it means. JJ

To: i-node who wrote (160315)	2/7/2003 12:32:26 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579831

David, <Now, we have every liberal on the planet saying, "GIVE INSPECTIONS MORE TIME" (everyone from the liberals on this thread to Susan Saradon and Martin Sheen).> They say that because they only want to stall for time. Think about it, if the inspectors were to find a big cache of chemical and/or biological weapons, would they be in favor of a war? Of course not! So what's the point of giving inspections more time if the outcome isn't going to change? Any way you slice it, these people are against war for any reason except in response to a direct attack, i.e. wait for the bodies to turn up. I only wish these liberals can admit the obvious, that the inspections are irrelevant. Tenchusatsu