Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (160346)	2/7/2003 6:17:41 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578962

However, an attack upon Turkey, if the war spills over from Iraq,would be. So let's see...we are going to attack Iraq pre-emptively, so Germany is obligated to support the pre-emptive attack to comply with Nato rules, in case the subject of that attack retaliates against a Nato member state, Turkey. What logic is this? Secondly, an attack by the guys trained in northern Iraq, against France and Britian would also require a NATO response. More of the same, only worse, since Northern Iraq is not even under Bagdhad control. What did Bali do to the terrorist. The attack on Bali was against Australians, who had pledged support for the US against Iraq. Kenya's attack was against our embassy. There is no question that they hate us for our support of Israel, having troops in SA, supporting regimes they hate, etc..we used them when they were fighting the USSR in Afghanistan and then we abandoned them once the Russians were thrown out. because Edwards agrees with Gw on Iraq He is playing to majority opinion. All these guys are to some extent. Doesn't make them right. Al