Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Win Lose or Draw : Be A Steve, Make A Call -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (1162)	2/7/2003 3:12:30 PM
From: Softechie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11447

COMPQ 1280...what's yer plan?

To: LTK007 who wrote (1162)	2/7/2003 3:13:40 PM
From: lifeisgood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11447

J.T. has been toasted and deep fried going on his RYDEX indicators. He's been 200% long since what, NAZ 2000? A couple hundred more points to the downside and he'll be broke. best... LIG

To: LTK007 who wrote (1162)	2/7/2003 3:13:51 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11447

NYSE and NAZ A/D volume has been on steady downtrend all day. Now both in -590million area.

To: LTK007 who wrote (1162)	2/7/2003 3:17:34 PM
From: Steve Lee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11447

years of selected rydex data here: schaeffersresearch.com You need to remember that rydex long fund holdings are going down over time cos they have little advantage over just buying an ETF on margin. On the other hand, the inverse rydex funds are available to people whose accounts don't let them short the ETF's, and do not have unlimited loss potential as shorting does. Net result of above two paragraphs is that it takes a larger number of rydex bears to be a contrary indicator than it did x yrs ago.