Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (72322)	2/8/2003 3:48:24 AM
From: Sig	Respond to of 281500

Other than sending a few troops and maybe 4 to 7 Carriers into the region, GW has not done much but talk.( and lined up 20 nations for support) This report , however, tells me he actually may be serious and start doing something about shutting down Saddam story.news.yahoo.com Sig

To: LindyBill who wrote (72322)	2/8/2003 7:24:39 AM
From: KonKilo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So which do think we ought to do? Bill, I read that only about 30% of Americans think GWB is credible when the subject is the Iraq invasion. His obvious desire for an invasion, coupled with his ever shifting rationale, is apparent to even the casual observer. Perhaps, like me, that 70% of Americans believe that something is wrong when you first decide that a military solution is required and then later decide on the goal. The old bromide of everything looking like a nail when you are a hammer has never proven so apt a metaphor. This is a war in search of a rationalization, and that seems un-American and wrong.