Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (72363)	2/8/2003 12:21:14 PM
From: Elsewhere	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I don't know, it sounds feasible to me, if Saddam would go for it. It could be a dialectic "dream solution", with Bush/Blair AND Schröder/Chirac being victorious. We will now face the ultimate test of Saddam's sanity. One of the many advantages of a UN Iraq invasion would be that European leaders would have much less difficulties marketing high expenditures of the Iraq operation to their peoples. Maybe it was an idea of the Pope - it reminds me of medieval "indulgence trades" (?), i.e. paying the Catholic church for being able to escape hell. US forces could move right on to North Korea which is much "hotter" currently.