SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KonKilo who wrote (3600)2/8/2003 11:44:58 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15987
 
Essentially they are proposing "coercive inspections," which I think is not a bad idea at all.
I agree, CB.

Excuse me Shiloh.. What if Saddam's republican guard refuses to grant access to UN inspectors, armed or not??

Then what do those UN forces do?? Shoot their way in??

And if so, doesn't that take us right back to where we are right now??

Hawk@thinkitthrough.com



To: KonKilo who wrote (3600)2/9/2003 12:52:04 AM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15987
 
But won't UN occupation of Iraq encourage more terrorist attacks? Or does that only happen when Saddam is removed from power? Or only when US troops occupy Iraq, and not French and Russian troops?

This is "occupation with a dictator-friendly face." US troops not welcome, and we'll look the other way if we find anything, mes amis.

Derek


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News