Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (8728)	2/9/2003 11:57:22 AM
From: N. Dixon	Respond to of 10293

Bill, I was asking a question in earnest. Bill has already spoken once with Dr. Lampert. To:Ellen who wrote (1271) From: Bill Wexler Sunday, Jul 18, 1999 10:47 PM View Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3392 ... Ironically, Dr. Carl Lampert - who is falsely credited with endorsing SPD by RFI stock promoters - opined that electrochromics can be used for the "widest variety of applications" in a paper submitted to a convention (held in Tempere, Finlad in mid-June 1999) for the glass processing industry. June 2002: WOODBURY, NY, June 12, 2002 - Research Frontiers Incorporated (Nasdaq: REFR), the developer and licensor of SPD light-control technology, has established an Advisory Board of professionals from various industries. Robert L. Saxe, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Research Frontiers commented: "Research Frontiers is a much different company today than it was even one year ago. After many years of developing our versatile SPD light-control technology, and then establishing a solid manufacturing supply infrastructure, products using SPD technology are now being mass-produced. Our success is not only attributable to the hard work of our employees and those of our licensees, but also from being able to draw upon the expertise of outside advisors. Our new Advisory Board which is composed of highly qualified experts, will continue this process and emphasizes our desire to solicit the best technological and marketing advice we can obtain." The initial members of the Advisory Board are: .....Dr. Carl Lampert. Dr. Carl Lampert is the Founder and President of Star Science, a consulting company to the glass industry headquartered in Santa Clara, California. Dr. Lampert formerly was the Group Leader at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories concentrating on chromogenics or switchable materials. Dr. Lampert graduated from University of California at Berkeley and has a doctorate in material science and engineering from Berkeley, as well as degrees in electrical engineering. Dr. Lampert consults to some of the world’s largest glass companies including, Schott Glass in Germany, Asahi Glass and Nippon Sheet Glass in Japan, and PPG Industries here in the United States. In the automotive industry, Dr. Lampert has worked for such companies as Visteon which was part of Ford Motor Company, as well as working with most of the world’s largest auto makers. Dr. Lampert also consults to various large chemical companies worldwide, and sits on the Board of Directors of Nan Optics Corporation and Aquila Instruments Ltd. As well as assisting others in their patent work, Dr. Lampert holds two patents in the field of chromogenics. Dr. Lampert also advises the U.S. Department of Energy, United Nations Development Programs, NATO, and the Canadian, Swedish, Australian, Indian and Japanese governments on projects involving chromogenics. He is the Editor-in-Chief of Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, as well as an Advisory Editor for the Journal of Displays. What's the harm in one more phone call? Are you defending his reluctance by attacking me? This is not about a "pet" stock. This is about serious market manipulation and defamation. Asensio was hired to extort shares from management and they were told if they didn't comply he would relentlessly attack them. Do you think that is okay? Do you condone those tactics? Your next door neighbor isn't on the internet soliciting investors to write to him for information about fraud. Your next door neighbor isn't contacting customers of licensees and making defamatory statements. Don't you see the difference? This isn't about Wexler's opinion, it's about his real intention and connections. His opinion of the stock has already been disproven. Even he can't defend it with any facts. ND