Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (8751)	2/9/2003 1:03:15 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

And just suppose that tomorrow Bill reports that he did call Dr. Lampert again, and that the story still hasn't changed and his quote is still taken out of context in the REFR press release. Then what? Will it change your mind about anything? Anything at all? Not if I know you. You're not here to question your own beliefs, just everyone else's. That's why you're such a waste of time.

To: N. Dixon who wrote (8751)	2/9/2003 2:04:07 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

In that particular quote...according to Dr. Lampert himself, he was NOT referring to SPD but to glazing technologies in general. The only cost-effective, viable glazing technology is EC. That's why GNTX is a real company with real sales...and REFR is a penny stock fraud that relies on obsessed cult followers such as yourself to prop it up. I don't know why you insist on pursuing this Dixon (because I am in the process of going net long quality stocks and at least partially covering frauds such as REFR), but - as usual - you are incorrect. I called Lampert and one of my friends (who was also short REFR) called him. Lampert did not disparage SPD, however he did say that RFI misrepresented his opinions in at least one press release. RFI spun his words to imply that he was endorsing SPD as better than other switchable-glazing technologies...when the exact opposite was true. Dixon, if I were you, I'd stop worrying about phone conversations I had with Lampert and worry more about the fact that RFI has had no real sales of SPD "products" despite claims of commercialization. Now go away.