Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (8770)	2/9/2003 10:48:37 PM
From: N. Dixon	Respond to of 10293

Yes, and another woman going as "alien" (with a bunch of numbers) does much the same on the ZIXI board, though her style is more like post the news article verbatim and implicitly dare anyone to question its relevance. I guess there's one in every crowd although why it always seems to be a woman I have no idea. I got my numbers from Dr. Lampert and the glass industry as well as licensees. You're still avoiding the question. Why was Dr. Lampert a good source in 1998 and not in 2003 when so much has transpired in the switching technology field? The most important of which is that EC is NOT producing large glass products, SPD is. So come up with some facts that counter the claims of several companies that have licensed SPD technology. Call Dr. Lampert and get his opinion about SPD vs the other technologies. I don't care if SPD has competition. The industry has stated they see switchable glass as a growing market. Since SPD is one of three vying for it and is the only one owned by one company, I think we'll get enough revenue to cover $4 million in expense and then some. In fact we'll get a lot more given just the production we see happening now. Why are you guys so threatened by me? I'm only saying call the source you called in 1998 and get an update. What are you so afraid of? ND