Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (57005)	2/10/2003 8:52:31 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

gold suffered a bubble just like equities did. So will your view on equities be the same in 5-10 years when the market finally bottoms-ng?

To: Voltaire who wrote (57005)	2/25/2003 5:33:47 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 65232

Real estate, bear, gold funds still shine By AMY BALDWIN THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Monday, February 24, 2003 NEW YORK -- Throughout Wall Street's three-year decline, three fund sectors -- gold, real estate and so-called bear-market funds -- have been a haven for investors, providing solid returns that offset some of the overall market's losses. The popular wisdom is that these funds have the best of their gains behind them, but some analysts say it's not too late to buy into them. With the economy still sputtering and the possibility of war with Iraq depressing the market, havens, or defensive sectors, still appeal to many investors. "A year ago, I thought gold had run out of steam, and I was wrong. So, there is always upside potential in these defensive-minded investments," said Jeff Tjornehoj, an analyst with fund tracker Lipper Inc. "With so much up in the air, I see some continued decent returns." Still, investors should also be careful, because these sectors can be volatile and the funds within them are often expensive, carrying expense ratios of 2 percent or more. And, there is a risk in focusing too much on stellar past performance, which doesn't guarantee that future returns will be just as stunning. "On the positive side, obviously you have the very high returns that these funds posted last year, but investors always need to be careful about chasing performance. And, gold and the gold funds are highly volatile," said Lynn Russell, a metals analyst at Morningstar, another fund-research company. "I would warn against investors rushing to chase performance given high (fund) prices and high volatility in this category." Russell said investors should also be wary of gold funds because the metal itself is trading at six-year highs. It's easy to see why these three fund varieties -- gold, bear market and real estate -- are attractive. Of the 41 equity-fund categories tracked by Lipper, only these three ended last year with positive returns: gold funds with a return of 63.3 percent; specialty diversified funds, which use techniques that work well in a bear market, with a return of 10.2 percent; and real estate funds, returning 4.2 percent. Gold funds have enjoyed by far the best performance, beating out all other types of stock funds throughout the bear period. Gold funds have an annualized two-year return of 39.1 percent, an annualized three-year return of 21.7 and an annualized five-year return of 7.5 percent, according to Lipper. And, so far this year, gold funds have a return of 1.4 percent, second only to China region funds with a return of 5 percent, according to Lipper. All other fund varieties have posted negative returns so far for 2003. Aside from gold and China region funds, specialty diversified equity funds are the only group with a positive return so far for the year. According to Lipper, these funds have a return of 0.7 percent, largely attributable to so-called bear funds. Bear-fund managers follow strategies that are rewarded when the market falls; that accounts for their two-year annualized return of 10.4 percent and a three-year annualized return of 8.9 percent. Although real estate funds have a negative return of 2.4 percent so far this year, they have an annualized three-year return of 11.6 percent, according to Lipper. seattlepi.nwsource.com