Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (7083)	2/11/2003 12:25:39 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 25898

Sure you did, by questioning one source and not the other. The idea that questioning the validity of a source endorses, whether explicitly or implicitly, those which ideologically oppose it is equal parts laughable and suspiciously defensive - however opportune you find such convoluted reasoning. It's the disputative equivalent of the recent "if you aren't with us, you're against us," which, like most of the other backpedaling you do, is hilariously dogmatic...in particular, when compared to the hopelessly idealistic, alternative media, lefty-at-any-cost stuff you typically post. No, it's not curious. To you, no - certainly not. But, since the inaccuracies were obvious, his and others' dishonesty is exposed for all to see. What are those "obvious" inaccuracies? (As you see them, of course.) LPS5