SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rkral who wrote (63052)2/10/2003 5:17:36 PM
From: willcousa  Respond to of 77400
 
I'm not sure you can get there from here. :) You really must know what rate the company used to calculate the after-tax benefit. I don't see getting an accurate result from using the effective rate for the year (which is a composite rate). I'll bet you could call investor relations and they might be willing to ask the tax folks and pass it back to you if they aren't too busy.



To: rkral who wrote (63052)2/10/2003 5:49:32 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77400
 
Hi Ron,

Yes. I assumed that any tax benefit from stock options would have arisen as a consequence of the Statutory Corporate Tax Rate applied to a pre-tax effective cost. And I assumed the origin of this effective cost was the realized proceeds.

But we can use indirect methods to triangulate on the same data points. Back in 2000 I did that for the thread. Can't find the post but it's easy to duplicate.

Look in the 10-K. In the consolidated statement of shareholder's equity you see they completed purchase acquisitions in the amount of $4,162 by issuing 78 million shares. The average price of the shares issued for acquisition was $53.36

In the notes under Stock Options they saw 176 million options exercised for average strike price of $5.75 each. I computed a pre-tax employee compensation for these 176 million options of $8,791 based on retrofitting tax rates to the tax benefit. Divide that by 176 million to get $49.94 as the average benefit, putting the average price of exercised shares at $55.69 [edit corrected]

The average daily high price of Cisco from 29 July '99 to 29 July '00 was $52.96 based on Yahoo historical quotes.

So I have three methods of arriving at average stock price through '99


Market Average 52.96 Dev -1.04 (-2%)
Purchase Average 53.36 Dev -0.64 (-1%)
Exercise Average 55.69 Dev +1.69 (+3%)
Average Average 54.00 Dev 0.00
[edit: corrected]


These triangulate to within about 3% of average, which is pretty darn close for something so volatile as stock price.

You can do the same calculation for each year if you like.

As far as getting tangled up in negative effective tax rates (or effective tax rates for that matter)... not a place I am willing to go. The tax code is a tangled mess where it is possible to earn money but pay no taxes and lose money and still have to pay taxes. Bleaugh!

John



To: rkral who wrote (63052)2/10/2003 5:52:38 PM
From: JimieA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77400
 
I think you and John are mixing two different aspects of stock options.

You are scheduling the costs according to the FAS. Where the cost of the stock option is determined at the grant date and amortized over the life of the option. Including est. tax benefits.

John S is determining option expense by taking the income tax benefit earned by Cisco, which is determined at the time of option exercise.

Two entirely different numbers. IMO.