Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (19485)	2/10/2003 5:01:16 PM
From: bearshark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Neocon: We can end this conclusively now if there are open minds here and if people will believe their eyes. I think my last note clearly shows the 757--especially its vertical wing.

To: Neocon who wrote (19485)	2/10/2003 8:23:51 PM
From: KonKilo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

I got this from an Urban Legends site... Neocon, I appreciate your posting that rebuttal link, I'd seen it before. My assertion is that too much of the evidence is contradictory. Did you notice one of the contradictions in the Urban Legends explanation? It caused damage to all five rings* (not just the outermost one) after penetrating a reinforced, 24-inch-thick outer wall....* Exterior photographs are misleading because they show only the intact roof structures of the outer rings and don't reveal that the plane penetrated all the way to the ground floor of the third ring. A Congressional investigation could answer these questions. Why has one not been convened after 17 months?