Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1266)	2/10/2003 7:36:16 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 48718

Hello Jori, <<do you think that it is reasonable to use that 1.3B multiplier when a good portion of that number is living in what amounts to agrarian conditions?>> No, but it is a way to write, and besides, urbanization is gathering speed, so trend is friendly. <<I think that the governmental structure and (dare I say it) corruption, has to be counted as a negative force in the Chinese economy.>> I agree, however the trend is for smaller government at all levels, and corruption, at first hand, is a manageable problem, so far. I have done work in Taiwan and Philippines, have heard first hand stories about Thailand and Indonesia, have seen second-hand reports about the Nasdaq, and so far I see nothing extraordinary in China corruption. The corruptors are getting reported, are getting shot, and those who are not, are careful, and therefore not terribly bold, when compared to any number of other countries and companies. The corruption issue in China is not what Collapse is made of, so far, and the trend is, again, positive. Chugs, Jay