Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aladin who wrote (72954)	2/10/2003 8:50:35 PM
From: Noel de Leon	Respond to of 281500

1)?? An inaccuracy in the article. 2) "signatory to the ICC" As a civilized nation should be. 3) Considering the number of overturned murder cases one has reason to doubt that this is true in the US. 4) Doesn't back up your point. You wrote: "Sounds like a good idea, but our Eurpean allies would nix it. These same countries that see no evil, hear no evil and of course speak no evil would try to put on trial any Iraqi they could get their hands on for war crimes/crimes against humanity (after its liberated). They will never agree to amnesty for whomever topples Saddam." Which is nonsense simply because anyone who topples Saddam from within would be welcomed by both the European community and the US as well as most of the rest of the world. 5)You referred twice to articles about an Iraqi general, who was arrested in Denmark. In those articles it was said that arresting the general could hinder other military figures from coming forward to topple Saddam. I said if that Iraqi general was so important to Bush's plans then he had ample time to get him out of Denmark.