SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (43117)2/10/2003 10:55:36 PM
From: bobby beara  Respond to of 52237
 
Haim, i'll have to search for that one, it may be on one of the computers i retired a long time ago, i don't know if i've saved those old files,

should have for posterity, huh -g-



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (43117)2/12/2003 1:08:52 PM
From: Gut Trader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
RCA 1929 vs AOL members.tripod.com



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (43117)3/10/2003 10:05:34 PM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Haim, i found that chart RCA chart, i created that chart 7/24/99, i remember we were posting to each other then about the 18-19 $vix, and the p/c ratios, however that top in july turned out to be only a short gambit until october, then the blow-off, the RCA chart at that time showed a lower high coming , but AOl made a higher high.

AOL didn't collapse like RCA, there are a lot of nasdaq charts that could look closer to RCA in the aftermath.

AOL was the blue-chip and smartest internet company, they didn't buy other overvalued companies, they bought something undervalued, Time-Warner, and they fooled a lot of smart money in that process, Ted Turner -g-.

Now if AOL was to follow the general path of RCA it could go back to 50 cents (1994 price), it may be there now if they hadn't bought Time-Warner.
home.thegrid.net
i added an update to the chart, the scale is off a bit.