Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (9326)	2/11/2003 1:30:10 PM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

If we withhold our funding from NATO and the UN we could take a big step towards cutting into the deficit. As for the cheese eating surrender monkeys and their allies in the axis of weasels they can all kiss my ass. I hope the terrorists move in and take over their POS country.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (9326)	2/11/2003 1:40:08 PM
From: Constant Reader	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14610

I'm not up to speed on what has been written here, but (FWIW) I'm afraid that if the Franco-German refusal to honor the sole reason for NATO's existence is successful, the defense of any member nation attacked by an outside party, then NATO is dead. The smaller countries must be wondering what it means for them. If Russia decides to resume building an empire, are Estonia and Latvia safe? Will France and Germany decide that they are unimportant? If Yugoslavia invades Slovenia, will anyone care? The treaty nations are not supposed to pick and choose their fights in this way - it is a mutual defense pact and Turkey is a member state. There are not levels of membership. They are entitled to the same defense that would be given to France, Germany or the UK. What a shame. OTOH, maybe it is just a sign that the relics of the Cold War, including the United Nations, have, at last, outlived their usefulness. Regards.