Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JHP who wrote (220610)	2/12/2003 11:00:37 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<have you read"Bringing Down The House>> No. I read the excerpt in Wired. Based on conversations with friends who are pro blackjack players, I have a couple problems with it. First of all, there wasn't much of a discussion of the inevitable swings and losses that occur, even if you're playing with every known advantage strategy (including shuffle tracking, counting with high level, multi-parameter counts, and team play). This is a basic, important reality that all blackjack players must deal with, ie, RISK. The point of view appears to be limited to "Kevin Lewis", but the MIT team was a HUGE organization, at its height it approached Al-Quieda in its complexity. Certainly its an intriguing story, and the MIT team existed and was highly successful....I'm just not sure that this is the book that does it justice. That said, I'll probably get around to reading it this summer, and it'll probably make a great movie some day.<NG> A better read, IMO, is Ken Uston's "The Big Player" if you can find a copy.