SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (73512)2/13/2003 4:20:01 AM
From: Sig  Respond to of 281500
 
Nice write-up by the NYT
<<< until now he has received an ambiguous message: that the United States will fight him no matter what, and that France and other Security Council members are opposed to using military force That leaves Iraq with little incentive to do anything but stall.>>>
Depends on what Saddam regards as ambiguous. Can the fact that the US and 20 Nations are willing to
eliminate him and not one country in the UN is willing to provide troops to defend him be called an ambiguous message ? .He needs a new dictionary
Sig



To: stockman_scott who wrote (73512)2/13/2003 11:22:30 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
This isn't an editorial, it's a Greek chorus!

I defy anyone to render this advice into a single sentence with any meaning.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News