SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (160840)2/13/2003 1:31:46 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573954
 
Like I said, let's just nuke 'em all. That's what the Bush camp really wants, Armageddon.

I don't believe this. I just believe that Bush, correctly, determined immediately after 9/11 that a partial solution to the problem is no solution.

This belief was expressed to Bush by his war cabinet within days of 9/11. All were in agreement that you could not defeat terrorism without first defeating Saddam.

It makes sense to me. However, even if Bush and his cabinet are wrong, getting rid of Saddam is going to free a lot of people and bring some stability to the region. Not a bad thing.

I've yet to see a competent arguement AGAINST ousting Saddam.



To: Rob S. who wrote (160840)2/13/2003 2:33:47 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573954
 
Hey guy, I am a Republican.

That's good to here. At least when you criticize Bush, they can't accuse you of partisan politics.

Why do you think Bush is so focused on Iraq vs al Qaeda?