Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brian1501 who wrote (160845)	2/13/2003 1:12:17 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575523

That's right.....they're not in deep holes at all, and yet, we can't find them. Why is this so hard for you to get. We know Iraq had them at one time. This is a fact. According to UN resolutions Iraq must either present the weapons they have to be destroyed, or prove that they were destroyed. Nowhere is it stated that we are supposed to hunt for these weapons. Can you get on the same page......we were talking about al Qaeda, not WMD. You all are obsessed with Iraq.....its unbelievable. ted

To: brian1501 who wrote (160845)	2/13/2003 3:51:57 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575523

Why is this so hard for you to get. We know Iraq had them at one time. This is a fact. According to UN resolutions Iraq must either present the weapons they have to be destroyed, or prove that they were destroyed. Nowhere is it stated that we are supposed to hunt for these weapons. I guess it all depends on your intent. If you want to be patient and disarm, then you hunt and detroy. If you want to go to war, then one pretext is as good as an other. Al