SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (160896)2/13/2003 6:11:05 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574250
 
Not that it will happen but...

If Iraq all of the sudden started fully complied with all the terms of the cease fire and all of the terms of the various UN resolutions. Showed us their WMD facilities, accounted for everything that we mentioned publicly, and other stuff that the administration may have not mentioned (so it could use it as a check of Iraq's claim to comply) plus other stuff that we didn't know about. Allowed ten times the amount of inspectors in with no restrictions on how and where they would inspect and who could be an inspector (none of this we do not accept this inspector because he is a spy stuff) Would you still support a war?

And the question for the opponents of war -

If you knew without a doubt that all the claims that Bush has made of Iraqi WMDs were true and that Iraq would have nukes within ten years if we did not invade, would you still be against forcibly removing Saddam from power?

Tim



To: i-node who wrote (160896)2/13/2003 6:13:11 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574250
 
>>>I think Bush has won...he can drive nearly any condition he wants.

If something happened now and we DID NOT go to war, it would be a disaster. At this point, the war has to happen.


And that was Bush's plan all along. That's why you all can be trusted!

ted