SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (12950)2/13/2003 9:37:35 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 89467
 
Artistic Sign Language: Symbols of the Coming Bush Fall
By Bernard Weiner
The Crisis Papers

Sign is symbol, symbol is sign. Consider:

*Powell goes to the United Nations so that the missile attacks on Baghdad and Basra
can begin -- and, in the lobby of that grand building, Picasso's "Guernica" painting,
which depicts the horrific results of the Nazi bombing of that Spanish town, is covered
over prior to Powell's arrival. No use embarrassing the U.S. by reminding folks of
what's in store for Iraqi civilians.

*Ashcroft, in his police-state zeal, begins shredding the Constitution's Bill of Rights
with its guarantees of due-process of law, and, early on, has the huge lobby statue of
the Goddess of Justice draped and covered over because of its exposed breast. How
appropriate to shroud Justice so that she can't see what's being done in her name.

*First Lady Laura Bush cancels a poetry workshop at the White House because she
suspects that a number of America's high-profile poets, in the sacred grounds of that
seat of power, will raise the issue of the coming war with Iraq.

Did you notice the thread that unites these events? In all three cases, symbolic shrouds are placed over
art, so that nobody will notice the bad things that are being done in American citizens' names.

But art knows. Art sees beyond, often before the general public is aware of what's going on. (Often
before the artists themselves are conscious of what they're revealing.) Art points us in new directions that
make us think and question.

To those inclined more to rigid-order mentality, art is a virus that needs to be stamped out, or, at the
least, tightly controlled. ("When I hear the word culture," said Nazi leader Goebbels, "I reach for my
revolver.")

It's all part of the so-called "cultural civil war." Those who control the signs and symbols control the
polity. Thus, minions are trotted out to denounce artists and their tendency to look for complexity, ironies,
hypocrisies, hidden humor. To incipient fascists, the world is a Manichean one, divided into black and
white, those who are Good and those who are Evil ("You're either for us or against us").

And since they are certain that God obviously favors their side, it follows that those in opposition -- or
even (or especially) those who point the way to other visions of complex reality -- are part of the enemy
forces and must be dealt with.

One problem with authoritarianism -- whatever brand comes along: Stalin's communism, or Hitler's
fascism, or Islamic Talibanism, or whatever we're moving into in America right now -- is that it makes art
more delicious and tempting. The public is not dumb and eventually comes to figure out that the "truth"
being propounded by the frightened rulers does not match the world most citizens actually live in. And so
they begin to seek out and support art and artists and, most of all, comedians -- those sly artisans, those
holy fools, that can shake the foundations of power with a well-aimed dart.

Musicians, playwrights, poets, painters, sculptors, dancers, novelists, filmmakers, online satirists,
comics -- everything these artists do in an authoritarian society comes to be seen by the public in the light
of the repression visited from above.

A story to illustrate this point: American avant-garde theater artist George Coates was invited to bring
his visual extravaganzas to Poland during the dark times there. One of the huge slide projections used by
Coates was of a manhole cover, which image covered the entire staging area. Various human forms
emerged from the holes -- i.e., real actors came out of holes in the stage, but, given the projection, they
appeared to be emerging from the holes in the manhole cover.

The audience took this in with rapt silence and then a few brave souls began clapping. Then waves and
waves of applause and cheering washed over the actors. Coates was mystified by the audience reaction.
Audiences in the U.S. loved this bit of theatrical magic, to be sure, but nothing like this Polish crowd.

After the show, various Polish theater artists came backstage to talk to Coates and his cast. They
nudged Coates in the ribs and whispered their admiration for his willingness to confront the Polish
Communist rulers by celebrating the "underground." Yes, what was merely an interesting use of a visual
image for Coates was a cunning reference to the underground resistance of a budding Solidarity movement.
After a few attempts at explaining himself, Coates simply smiled and nodded as the Poles heaped praise
on his revolutionary "political" art.

Art has power. Art unmasks. Art tells lies in the service of truth. (Whereas governments lie in order to
conceal truth.)

The more lies authoritarian governments tell their citizens, the more a sub rosa consciousness bubbles
up from the culture's artists and then from its ordinary citizens. It's a slow-growing and, at times, dangerous
movement -- which is why the forces of reaction try so hard to stomp on it -- but it is an amazingly strong
and vital and resilient force.

Because totalitarian governments rest on fake foundations, when those regimes fall, they fall with
amazing quickness and ferocity. One day there's a wall, the next day it's torn down and the celebrations
begin. One day there is officially sanctioned art, the next day those huge statues are toppled. One day, the
culture arbiters and censors are in control, the next day they are in disgrace -- or in jail.

Americans, still gripped by fear from 9/11, have tended to be in a state of animated numbness, putting
up little resistance to the machinations of the authoritarian rulers. Similarly, out of great sympathy for the
post-9/11United States, various nations around the world bowed to the wishes of the Bush government.

Bush&Co., meeting little resistance, interpreted this relative lack of opposition as full support for their
programs, foreign and domestic. And so they've continued to want more, tighten the screws more, reach
and then over-reach for more. Their motto and guiding principle seems to be: "We can't be stopped, so let's
just go take it all."

Suddenly, though, Bush&Co. are running into overt opposition. Their allies abroad are telling them -- to
their face -- that current American policies are mad, wrong, dangerous. More and more conservative allies
at home are warning the Bush Administration that their dash toward imperial rule abroad and draconian
Constitution-shredding at home is a violation of what America stands for, and will bring the United States
(and, given the economic interweavings between nations, much of the world as well) nothing but disaster.

The current U.S. rulers will not alter their course. It's war with Iraq, full speed ahead and to hell with the
rest of you -- especially ignorant "old Europe," and American dissidents at home. It's a proposed extension
of the so-called USA Patriot Act, to give the federal government even more martial-law-like police powers in
controlling the society -- the "cover" is hunting for terrorists, of course -- and to hell with the protections
guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

These Bush&Co. leaders are so arrogant, so rude, so greedy and power-hungry, so taken with
themselves as God's mesengers and as the world's only Superpower, so convinced they are right in the
tunnel-vision black-and-white world they inhabit, that it's clear their days are numbered. It may take a bit
longer to build to critical mass -- and there is going to be death and destruction and persecution while that
momentum is being built up -- but when the time for their fall arrives, it's going to be quick and nasty. And
we'll finally all wake up from this nightmare that has crushed our economy, diminished our moral light in the
world, disgraced our beloved Constitution and country.

And at the vanguard of this movement away from the shadow America and back into the light will be our
our poets, our comedians, our painters, our playwrights, our novelists, and so on -- "dangerous" artists all,
even when they're not political. They simply see too much, too clearly.

A toast to their hungry vision.

-------

Bernard Weiner, a Ph.D. in government & international relations, has taught at various universities,
served as theater critic for the San Francisco Chronicle, and written widely for progressive journals. He is
co-editor of The Crisis Papers (www.crisispapers.org).
CC



To: stockman_scott who wrote (12950)2/14/2003 9:18:30 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 89467
 
Worth Reading AGAIN...
Thx again scott.........
(My Mother called from Chicago very worried about 'Attacks'...Wondering what to do
I told her to call her Senator...and Congressman and Vote for IMPEACHMENTS ...NOW)
Tim

Let's Call Bush On His Bogus Terror Threats
By Kurt Nimmo
nimmo@zianet.com
2-11-3

FEMA and Tom Ridge say I need to be prepared.

This is what they tell me I need to do: rush out to the local hardware store and buy duct tape, plastic sheeting, and batteries for the radio. Next run over to the grocery store and stock up on bottled water and food. FEMA says I should keep some of this stuff separated in a backpack just in case we need to evacuate quickly.

Bush elevated the color-coded terrorism threat level to orange last week in response to the possibility of a chemical or biological attack. Ridge told reporters the other day the terrorism alert issued last week is "the most significant" since 911. "The threat is real," he warned.

Yeah, right.

I'm not rushing out to the store. I'm not buying into Bush's propaganda war. I don't think al-Qaeda is capable of launching a chemical or biological assault of any measurable significance against America. In fact, I don't think al-Qaeda is anywhere near as organized and ominous as Bush and Ridge and the corporate media keep telling us it is. It's nothing more than a terrifying and mostly imaginary monster used to frighten the people into acquiescence.

Are there pissed off Muslims who'd kill Americans if given half the chance?

You bet.

There are also pissed off Israelis who'd kill Palestinians, pissed off Hindus who'd kill Muslims, and pissed off drivers who'd run you down for making a lane change. I'm more worried about this last category than I am about anything Osama bin Laden may or (more likely) may not do. I'm more worried about some nut with a gun freaking out while I'm shopping for my plastic sheeting and duct tape than I am about becoming a "soft" target for al-Qaeda. I'm more worried about Tom Ridge and the Ministry of Homeland Security, John Ashcroft and the Justice Department, and what FEMA may have in mind for me and others who not only think these so-called terrorists alerts are pure and unadulterated bullshit, but who also think Bush is an illegitimate poseur and the invasion of Iraq will be an immense crime perpetuated against humanity.

Now don't get me wrong. I think there's a good chance there will be some kind of "terrorist" attack in the near future.

Bush needs a terrorist attack, so there will be one.

Remember the anthrax scare that followed on the heels of 911? Remember how frightened everybody was? People were scared to go out and collect their mail. Remember the Bushites attempting to place the blame on Saddam? Well, as it now turns out, Saddam bought the Vollum strain of anthrax from American Type Culture Collection, a company based in Rockville, Maryland. The anthrax used in the Washington attacks was traced back to the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Maryland. It was the Ames strain, not the Vollum strain.

Put two and two together.

Who do you think sent out those microbe-infested letters? It sure the hell wasn't Saddam Hussein. Since it now appears somebody in the US military may have perpetuated this terrorist attack, the FBI investigation has conveniently stalled. Since Bush couldn't scam the people into thinking it was Saddam, the crime will now be allowed to die a neglected death.

I'm more afraid of the CIA and the Department of Defense than Saddam Hussein. Why? Because they actually have an extensive track record of using biological, chemical, and nuclear agents on unsuspecting Americans.

The CIA has dosed people with LSD without their consent, the Navy released a cloud of bacteria from ships in San Francisco, the US military released toxic clouds of zinc cadmium sulfide gas over Winnipeg, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Fort Wayne, the Monocacy River Valley in Maryland, and Leesburg, Virginia. Thousands of people were exposed to the airborne germs Serratia marcescens and Bacillus glogigii in New York and San Francisco. Mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever were released over Savannah, Georgia, and Avon Park, Florida. The US Army dropped light bulbs filled with Bacillus subtilis variant niger into ventilation grates throughout the New York City subway system. In 1987 the Department of Defense admitted that, despite a treaty banning research and development of biological agents, it continued to operate research facilities at 127 facilities and universities around the nation. In 1995 the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (formed by President Clinton in January 1994) concluded that several different agencies of the US government had conducted thousands of human radiation experiments and several hundred intentional releases of radiation.

No, I'm not particularly worried about Saddam Hussein.

It's Donald Rumsfeld I'm worried about.

In 1983 Rummy traveled to Iraq to shake hands with Saddam Hussein -- and soon thereafter the Reaganites showered the brutal Iraqi regime with scads of military intelligence, economic aid, and covert supplies of munitions (including the aforementioned anthrax) for use in its war against Iran. "It is hard to believe that, during most of the 1980s, America knowingly permitted the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission to import bacterial cultures that might be used biological weapons," writes Christopher Dickey and Evan Thomas (the quote is taken from an article Senator Byrd inserted in the Congressional Record on September 20, 2002).

Rumsfeld the Enabler, now leading the charge against Saddam. These guys are really a piece of work. Why should you trust them any further than you can throw them?

Is it crazy to think Bush and his Masters of Death and Destruction at the Pentagon would pull off a bio attack and blame it on Saddam or the now mythical (or apparently invisible) Osama bin Laden?

Nope.

All you have to do is surf on over to the National Security Archive's website and search for "Operation Northwoods." It will return a formerly top secret document titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba." It was cobbled together by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Seems the Joint Chiefs thought it was a dandy idea to stage assassinations, blow up things (like passenger airplanes), and sink ships jammed full of refugees and blame it all on the Cubans as a pretext for an invasion of Cuba. The Joint Chiefs were gunning for Castro. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara and President Kennedy nixed this fantastically fascist idea.

Would Bush and Rummy do the same?

Cui bono? That's Latin for "who benefits?" It's a term used a long time ago when the Romans were investigating crimes. It's an expression that pops in my head when Ridge and FEMA start talking about making sure you have a flash light and battery operated radio and a big roll of duct tape because you never know when Saddam or al-Qaeda or some enemy who hates our way of life may release anthrax or small pox or blow up a dirty bomb in the parking lot of the Mall of America. Cui bono? Not Saddam because it would give the US a perfect excuse to bomb the hell out of his country like the US bombed the hell out of Afghanistan after 911. Saddam might be a sadist but he certainly isn't an idiot. Also, as a megalomaniac, he wants to stay in power. Killing shoppers in Cleveland or Tampa is the wrong way to go about making sure you stay in power (or remain alive).

It just doesn't make sense.

Of course, since the Bush administration thinks Americans are so gullible (and, unfortunately, too many of them are), they keep throwing out flimsy and transparent pretenses in a desperate attempt to pin terrorism on Saddam.

Secretary of State Colin Powell was no sooner caught with his pants down at the United Nations -- thanks to his buddy, Tony Blair, who gave him some kid's homework as evidence against Saddam -- then Powell told the Senate Budget Committee he had a transcript "of what Bin Laden, or who we believe to be Bin Laden, will be saying on al-Jazeera during the course of the day... Once again he speaks to the people of Iraq and talks about their struggle and how he is in partnership with Iraq." At first al-Jazeera said they had no such tape and then later in the day they said they did. Maybe the CIA gave Powell the tape before they delivered it to al-Jazeera? Oops.

But even if bin Laden really is on the tape, so what?

He didn't say he was in "partnership" with Saddam, but the Iraqi people. But then, since the US will bomb the Iraqi people regardless, maybe this distinction is lost on Powell (who, after all, said last time the US bombed Iraq the number of dead wasn't something that "interested" him). It's probably irrelevant to Powell, as well, that bin Laden hates Saddam and offered to lead the mujahadeen against his secular dictatorship.

None of this means squat at the end of the day because the real target of Bush's attack is the Iraqi people. For Bush and Rumsfeld and Cheney there is no difference between Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi people. In fact, the Iraqi people (and all the other people on Bush's hit list) are more of a threat because they will resist occupation and subjugation.

Even if Saddam moved to Saudi Arabia and shared a guest house with Idi Amin, even if he stood on his head on the White House lawn and kissed Dubya's shoes, it wouldn't change the fact Bush and Crew are going to kill an additional 500,000 or more innocent Iraqis. Murder's in the script and the UN, the French, the Germans, and millions of Americans demonstrating in the street will not change it.

Bush is attempting to whip up fear and hysteria with these completely transparent threat warnings.

For Americans, his message is: Although we cannot give you specifics on the terrorist threat, you need to prepare, you need to be in a state of paranoid readiness, you need to hate and fear the people we say you need to hate and fear (today Saddam, yesterday Osama, next week maybe Kim Jung-il of North Korea), who are our official enemies, our shifting visage of Emmanuel Goldstein.

The American people certainly need to be prepared for the next anthrax scare or worse (maybe a controlled release of chicken pox so you won't question that needless vaccination) because there's one country after another that needs to be invaded.

Oh, and the Son of Patriot Act needs to be steamrolled through Congress. Just in case you get any funny ideas about freedom and liberty and all that stuff written in the Constitution.

Son of Patriot Act is even more draconian than its predecessor, but then the next attack may be more draconian and severe than 911.

As for the Iranians, the Syrians, and the North Koreans -- all they need to do is keep their eyes on what will soon happen to the Iraqis.

All they need to do if they love their children is submit to the new masters. All they need to do is give up their oil and other natural resources to transnational corporations. They also need to allow the US to set up military bases.

In the meantime, I'm not buying sheets of plastic and rolls of duct tape. I'm not watching CNN or Fox News or tuning in my portable radio to the emergency station. I won't hide in the closet or lock myself in the bathroom and tape plastic sheets over the door. I refuse to cringe in fear and hope Tom Ridge, John Ashcroft, and Dubya will save me from the monsters they created (or, rather, the monsters the CIA created).

I'm calling a spade a spade.

If the DoD or the CIA or whatever malignant "intelligence" agency decides it wants to gas the small town where I live, or even parachute in bogus al-Qaeda operatives to do us harm, there's nothing I can do about it.

Not directly, anyway.

All I can do is continue writing this and attend the antiwar demonstrations here in my small town. I can speak out, refuse to believe the lies, and urge my neighbors and others I pass in the street to do the same. If there are enough of us maybe one day soon we can put a stop to all this madness and send Bush packing back to his ranch in Crawford, Texas.

Or send him signed, sealed, and delivered to International Criminal Court to face charges of crimes against humanity.

On that day that happens it will be Christmas all over the world.

rense.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (12950)2/14/2003 9:19:22 AM
From: JHP  Respond to of 89467
 
was this great man BYRD-g-
a leader of the KKK?
ROFLMAO

<<"This Administration has turned the patient art of diplomacy into threats, labeling, and name calling of the sort that reflects quite poorly on the intelligence and sensitivity of our leaders, and which will have consequences for years to come. Calling heads of state pygmies, labeling whole countries as evil, denigrating powerful European allies as irrelevant -- these types of crude insensitivities can do our great nation no good."



To: stockman_scott who wrote (12950)2/14/2003 9:21:15 AM
From: JHP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
was this great man BYRD-g-
a leader of the KKK?
ROFLMAO
edit insensitivities
CRUDE INSENSITIVIES!!

<<"This Administration has turned the patient art of diplomacy into threats, labeling, and name calling of the sort that reflects quite poorly on the intelligence and sensitivity of our leaders, and which will have consequences for years to come. Calling heads of state pygmies, labeling whole countries as evil, denigrating powerful European allies as irrelevant -- these types of crude insensitivities can do our great nation no good."



To: stockman_scott who wrote (12950)2/14/2003 12:02:38 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Aziz's welcome fuels US anger
against Europe
From Richard Owen in Rome

IN SUIT and tie rather than his trademark military
uniform, Tariq Aziz, the Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister,
flew into Rome yesterday amid a deepening rift
between Washington and the Vatican.

His five-day visit to Rome and Assisi has infuriated
the Bush Administration and worsened the United
States’s strained relations with Europe.

The Bush Administration has complained vigorously
to the Vatican that the Pope, who receives Mr Aziz
today, has sent an envoy to Baghdad but not to the
US. America has sent a conservative Catholic
scholar, Michael Novak, to persuade the Vatican
that it was pursuing a “just” war.

Vatican officials point out that Donald Rumsfeld, the
US Defence Secretary, did not find time to call on
the Pope when in Rome last week for talks with
Signor Berlusconi. The Vatican has considered
sending Cardinal Pio Laghi, a former ambassador to
Washington, as an emissary to the US, but instead
the Pope sent Cardinal Roger Etchegaray to
Baghdad. He is due to meet Saddam Hussain
tomorrow.

Mr Aziz said that the US’s real intentions were “oil
and domination” and praised the Vatican for “doing
their best to stop this aggression”. He said that the
US had “made up its mind to attack whatever
concessions Iraq makes” and that, consequently, he
would not invite the Pope to visit Baghdad
because“we cannot guarantee his security”.

Later he said that UN weapons inspectors would be
able to prove Iraq did not have weapons of mass
destruction if given enough time.

On the eve of the UN Security Council briefing by
Hans Blix, the chief weapons inspector, Mr Aziz
dismissed charges that Iraq’s al-Samoud 2 missile
is in breach of UN resolutions.

“The main problem is that Iraqi missiles of a short
range do not have a guidance system, and when a
missile does not have a guidance system it can go
five, ten or fifteen kilometres beyond target,” he said.
“That is not very dangerous and must not be
exaggerated.”

At the Italian Parliament Mr Aziz met leaders of the
Centre Left Opposition. Despite his strident
criticisms of the Berlusconi Government for its
support of Mr Bush’s policies on Iraq, many on the
Right were also keen to “share the TV limelight”.
Franco Frattini, the Foreign Minister, said that he
would meet Mr Aziz today, but would “firmly insist
that Iraq disarm immediately, totally, and effectively”.

Roberto Formigoni, the Centre Right President of
Lombardy and an “old acquaintance” of Mr Aziz,
claimed after meeting him that there was “still a
chance for peace”.

Mr Aziz added that he would put his uniform back on
and fight if war broke out. Asked if Iraq would use
“non-conventional weapons”, he replied: “We don’t
have weapons of that kind, consequently we cannot
use them. We had them in 1991, but did not use
them then.” Iraq was “merely the first to pay the
price of the new post Cold War American
arrogance”.