SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (73934)2/14/2003 3:26:35 PM
From: paul_philp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 

That statement is incorrect? How so, Paul? Let me just ask you this, if as it appears Iraq has complied with and agreed to all the conditions given them, then what more can they do? Why go through this charade if there was never any intent not to wage war? Anyway, I'd appreciate your information that I'm light on. Thanks.


Karen,

I am not going to answer your question. It is a strawman hardly worth comment. However, if you read 1441 and then read Blix's testimony today, I am confident that you will find your answer without the need to count on any US statements at all.

Paul



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (73934)2/14/2003 4:40:24 PM
From: JustTradeEm  Respond to of 281500
 
Karen, actually Blix explicitly contradicted the statement you made.

Blix stated that although they were not found, it does not mean they don't exist.

I agree, you actually need to read 1441. You seem to twist it daily to suit your purpose du jour !

Simply put, Iraq is not in compliance.

JB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News