Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (161124)	2/14/2003 5:17:36 PM
From: Rob S.	Respond to of 1573927

I don't think so; things either have or have not changed after 9/11 . .which way is it? Either you believe that the U.S. has been given the "moral imperative" to demand that regimes throughout the world stop supporting terrorism and stop building the means of "mass destruction or you don't. If so, then we can continue to impose tougher measures to discover attempts by Saddam to build nuclear or biological weapons. A large segment of the civilized world wants the inspection process to play out. Do you think Saddam is that big of a threat? I don't buy it. I hope that the war goes as quickly and painlessly as it is being sold to the public. If the U.S. can declare a clear victory within a few weeks AND comes in with a big aide program to keep Iraq from sliding back into just another dictatorship or a civil war, then it will be a worthwhile gamble. I think time is more on our side than it is on Saddam's.