SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FaultLine who wrote (74018)2/14/2003 6:23:40 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
The show was rerun three times on different PBS stations in the Bay area today. Friedman was worth watching.


I thought Kissinger was more interesting, as he is trying to think about what the international system will be post-Iraq. Friedman is too facile these days.



To: FaultLine who wrote (74018)2/14/2003 7:22:36 PM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 281500
 
Friedman was worth watching.

I go hot and cold on Friedman, probably inversely correlated to Nadine's hot and cold. He is in some sort of hard spot, perhaps between the proverbial rock and hard place. I don't know. And I don't think there is any way to know exactly what it is. But he seems to go strong one way one day and the other another day. At first I thought it was admirable, an ability to hold two contradictory thoughts at the same time. But, as an op ed columnist, he has to resolve them some way. I haven't seen that.



To: FaultLine who wrote (74018)2/14/2003 8:11:12 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Friedman was worth watching.


As John has mentioned, he can't decide if the wants to "Shit or get off the pot." Too much, "on one hand, but on the other hand." I thought he was tiresome about the Kyoto Protocol.