SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (21474)2/14/2003 10:07:15 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27758
 
International Community Still Split on Iraq Report







Friday, February 14, 2003
URL:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,78642,00.html

By Liza Porteus


NEW YORK — Foreign ministers from all corners of the globe took turns Friday reacting to reports from international chief weapons inspectors, who said that while Iraq is cooperating more than usual in the disarmament process, there is still much work to be done.





Chief weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei gave their reports to the U.N. Security Council in New York on Friday.

The reports are expected to be a deciding factor in whether the United States -- with or without the support of its allies -- will use military force to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and to force him to disarm.

"The threat of force must remain," U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said following the report. "We cannot wait for one of these terrible weapons to show up in our cities and wonder where it came from … this is the time to go after the source of this weaponry."

Many expected Friday's events would lead to a potentially divisive showdown between the U.S. and Great Britain and France, Russia and China, all of which would have veto power over a new resolution that might call for military action.

Germany, which does not have veto power, also opposes immediate military action.

French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said the international community cannot doubt its common commitment to make sure Saddam is disarming, but he reiterated that inspections are the way to do this.

"The option of inspections has not been taken to the end; it can provide an effective end," de Villepin said. "Real progress is emerging."

Speaking about U.S. claims that links can be found between Iraq and Al Qaeda, de Villepin said, "Nothing allows us to establish such links."

He said the use of force would be "fraught with risk" for people and the region, and that "it should only be envisioned as a last resort."

"No one today can claim that the path of war will be shorter than the path of inspection" nor that it will lead to a "safer, more just, more stable world … for war is always the sanction of failure," de Villepin said. "The use of force is not justified at this time."

The French minister called for the ministers to convene again on March 14 for another update.

Several allies, including France, Germany and Russia, have called for giving the inspectors more time, an idea opposed by the Bush administration.

The Blix-ElBaradei report "shows very clearly that in Iraq, a unique potential has been established in this area of inspections and monitoring," said Igor Ivanov, the foreign minister of Russia, which supports the Franco-German initiative to boost the number of weapons inspectors and give them more time for searches.

"There is movement in the right direction and we cannot ignore that," Ivanov said.

"Force can be resorted to, but only when all other remedies have been exhausted. As can be seen from the discussion today, we have not yet reached that point, and I hope we will not reach that point."

Syria's Foreign Minister, Farouq al-Shara, said it seems as if "substantial progress has been made by the inspectors," and that "we are for a peaceful settlement."

Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan, while urging a political solution, said "Iraq must implement the relevant Security Council resolutions … we urge the Iraqi side to recognize fully the importance and urgency of inspections and provide more cooperation in a more proactive way."

He also said the Security Council "has to step up its effort for inspections" and handle the Iraq matter appropriately in order to maintain its credibility.

But the foreign ministers of Spain and the United Kingdom supported the U.S. stance that Saddam isn't living up to his disarmament promises and isn't being as forthcoming as he should with weapons inspectors.

"Iraq's material breaches, which we spelled out on the eighth of November, are still there," said British Foreign Minister Jack Straw, referring to when the group passed Resolution 1441. Saddam needs to bring about a "dramatic and immediate change" to avoid war, he said.

"Let's just remind ourselves that Iraq is the only country in the world that has launched missile attacks on five of its neighbors" and has attacked and killed hundreds of his own people, Straw said. "We all agreed upon the importance of 1441 and it is striking that no one who has spoken so far … has suggested for a second that Iraq is fully and actively complying with the obligations we imposed on them."

Straw said the Security Council members need to "hold our nerve."

The international body's responsibility "will not get any easier, but much harder," he said. "The issue is not just with Iraq, but how we deal with proliferations throughout the world."

Prior to Straw's speech, Spain's foreign minister, Ana Palacio, also stepped up to bat for the U.S. position.

"What we don't need is more inspections … the more noncompliance there is from Saddam Hussein, the more radically the international community has to act," she said.

"We would be sending a message of weakness on the part of this council," if 1441 is not upheld, she added, and therefore, "this council would lose its credibility."

Spain's ambassador to the United States, Javier Ruperez, told Fox News that "the bottom line is, we cannot go on with this charade" and that inspectors have had enough time.

The United States says Iraq has weapons of mass destruction in violation of several U.N. resolutions, an assertion denied by Baghdad. President Bush has said war is his last resort to disarm Saddam while making it clear that time is running out on any other options.

"Resolution 1441 was not about inspections. Let me say that again: Resolution 1441 was not about inspections. Resolution 1441 was about the disarmament of Iraq," Powell said.

Bush has said he would welcome a new U.N. resolution to bolster his case, but says he has no qualms about confronting Saddam without one.

"Nowhere did the world receive any comfort today in New York that Saddam Hussein has shown the world he has disarmed -- quite the contrary," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Friday afternoon, calling Saddam's disarmament claims a "mirage."

Powell had plans to meet with all 14 members of the Security Council on Friday. His diplomacy efforts will focus on the foreign ministers of France, Russia and Germany. France and Russia, with their power to veto a new U.N. resolution to authorize force, held the key to the Bush administration's effort to rid Iraq of any weapons of mass destruction.



To: calgal who wrote (21474)2/15/2003 10:40:04 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27758
 
Blair: Deposing Hussein Would Be 'Act of Humanity'








URL:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,78687,00.html
Saturday, February 15, 2003


LONDON — Prime Minister Tony Blair said Saturday it would be "an act of humanity" to depose Saddam Hussein and insisted signs of Iraqi cooperation with weapons inspectors were suspect.





"Ridding the world of Saddam would be an act of humanity," Blair told a conference of his ruling Labor Party in Glasgow, Scotland as he laid out a "moral case" for military action against Iraq.

"It is leaving him there that is inhumane. That is why I do not shrink from military action should that indeed be necessary."

Blair said Iraq's recent concessions "are suspect," though he still believed the crisis could be solved peacefully through the United Nations. Weapons inspectors would be given more time, he said, but he called on the international community not to shy from the possibility of war.

"If we show weakness now, if we allow the plea for more time to become just an excuse for prevarication until the moment for action passes, then it will not only be Saddam who is repeating history," said Blair, to muted applause from the delegates, many of whom oppose war without U.N. backing.

"The menace, and not just from Saddam, will grow; the authority of the U.N. will be lost; and the conflict when it comes will be more bloody," Blair said.

The prime minister, who faced a major anti-war rally in London Saturday as part of a global day of protest, said he understood concerns about military action.

"The moral case against war has a moral answer: it is the moral case for removing Saddam," Blair said.

Blair referred to deaths from Iraq's conflicts under Saddam Hussein, including the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war and bloody crackdowns on Iraq's minorities. He said those deaths outnumbered the protesters in London's streets.

"If 500,000 people are on the march, that is less than the number of deaths Saddam is responsible for. If one million people are on the march, that is still less than the number of people who died in wars that he started," he added to applause.

The strongest applause, however, was reserved for Blair's comments on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: "There will be no stability in the Middle East until there is a lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians, based on a secure Israel and a viable Palestinian state."

Blair's speech came a day after the chief U.N. inspectors' reports gave fresh encouragement to opponents of military action.

Chief inspectors Hans Blix and Mohammed ElBaradei avoided harsh criticism of the Iraqi regime when they reported to the U.N. Security Council. The majority of council members cited the reports of improved Iraqi cooperation to call for renewed efforts to peacefully disarm Saddam.

Blair was skeptical of Iraq's intentions, however.

"To anyone familiar with Saddam's tactics of deception and evasion, there is a weary sense of deja vu," Blair said. "As ever, at the last minute, concessions are made. The concessions are suspect, unfortunately the weapons are real."

Although Blair has enthusiastically rallied behind Washington's tough stance on Iraq, opposition to war in Britain is strong. Opinion polls indicate a large majority of Britons oppose military action against Saddam's regime without U.N. backing.

Several senior Labor lawmakers planned to take part in Saturday's rally in London and have been sharply critical of the prime minister's passionate support of President Bush.

Fifty-seven lawmakers, most from Labor, signed a motion Thursday demanding Britain stay out of a war unless it is authorized by Parliament. Ministers have promised lawmakers a vote on any war, but not necessarily before fighting starts.

Labor chairman John Reid acknowledged Friday there was "widespread anxiety" in the party, but said leaders have a duty to lead "when they believe this country and the world to be in peril."



To: calgal who wrote (21474)2/15/2003 10:47:08 AM
From: calgal  Respond to of 27758
 
NATO Hopes to Settle Dispute Over Iraq Plan by Next Week

URL:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,78691,00.html
Saturday, February 15, 2003


BRUSSELS, Belgium — NATO members were reported in top-level negotiations Saturday seeking a compromise in a dispute over planning for a possible Iraq war that has produced the alliance's worst split in years.





For the past month, Germany, France and Belgium have blocked a U.S. proposal for NATO to send early warning planes, missile defenses and anti-biochemical warfare units as a precaution to Turkey, the only NATO country bordering Iraq.

The holdouts argued such a step could undercut efforts to find a peaceful solution to the Iraq crisis. The other 16 NATO allies said the delay undermined NATO's credibility as an alliance that defends its members and sent a signal of weakness to Saddam Hussein's regime.

On Saturday, a day after weapons inspectors' reports at the U.N. Security Council gave fresh encouragement to opponents of military action against Iraq, diplomats and officials in Brussels said efforts accelerated to de-escalate the division within NATO.

A senior diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a solution was likely Monday or Tuesday in which all 19 allies would reaffirm the alliance's "solidarity and determination to stick to its obligations."

He refused to elaborate on what else the compromise would involve. But others indicated support was building to use NATO's defense planning committee — which France withdrew from in the 1960s — to authorize the deployment of AWACS surveillance aircraft to Turkey.

The head of the Italian Senate's foreign relations committee, Fiorello Provera, said after meetings Friday at NATO headquarters that U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Burns had suggested the supporters of the Turkey deployment were considering turning to that committee.

Other defensive measures could be handled bilaterally. Germany was already sending Patriot missiles to Turkey through the Netherlands, for example.

Belgian Foreign Ministry spokesman Didier Seeuws declined to comment on what Belgium would do. But he confirmed consultations were under way at a "high political level."

"There are indeed efforts going on to de-dramatize everything by Monday or Tuesday," he said.