Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vitas who wrote (8299)	2/14/2003 9:58:03 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Try a more sensible question, Vitas!

To: Vitas who wrote (8299)	2/14/2003 10:05:57 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

I would like to see him answer that too.

To: Vitas who wrote (8299)	3/7/2003 11:08:18 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

Thank you, Vitas. That's the first time I saw that question. Again, I've now got 1133 inbox messages. Now that you've brought it to my attention, I'm happy to answer your question. Actually if you do some research--you do do research, don't you?--you'll note that in most Muslim nations the child population is near the 50 percent mark. You might wish to ask your buddy, PROLIFE, why this might be the case. So, in effect, were the US to invade other Middle East nations the children dying innocent would be a similar problem. Yes, Saddam is a tyrant dictator and he was once A-1 on the US list, just like these guys: home.iprimus.com.au Now, do dictators murder their political enemies? Yes. And that's precisely why we hate dictators. Here's a question for you. If the Saudis coughed up on their oil resources, and Saddam had not been highlighted --whatever the political motivation--into the bogeyman, do you think the US government and the US businessmen would be cozy with him in order to get a good deal for oil, especially if there didn't exist new Shock and Awe type technology, technology thought to sanitize the warring process with little risk to American lives?