SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vitas who wrote (8436)2/15/2003 2:44:04 AM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
The real question is did they all vote to invade the country?

What did they vote to do in order to persuade Iraq into compliance?



To: Vitas who wrote (8436)2/15/2003 10:01:19 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
The man with the charge of UN 1441, in his most recent report to the Security Council Ministers Meeting, held yesterday, clearly noted that Iraq was not in non-compliance, that the inspections were working and more time was needed. The beauty of Resolution 1441 is that it allows for more time.

After the report was delivered, only the US, only the US and Great Britain, and to a lesser extent, Spain, were less than satisfied. The remaining members each made remarks calling for continuation of the inspections.

Didn't you see anything yesterday relative to the meetings?

Oh, and Vitas, since you've annointed yourself as the grand inquisitor on this thread, let me turn this around a bit and ask you a question: Have you seen Russia's refutation to Powell's intelligence briefing? If so, what are your comments?