Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (28182)	2/15/2003 6:32:24 PM
From: habitrail	Respond to of 36161

I think that you correctly anticipate the E-MFrs intent. The one wildcard is DEBT. Slider, I know that you're gonna pull those nickel jobbies of yours on me for posting this link again, but economagic.com Can this go on forever? Can the EMF-ing continue when the debt reaches yet another level of uber-mega-ridiculousity?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (28182)	2/16/2003 5:00:29 AM
From: habitrail	Respond to of 36161

<<A-N-T-I-C-I-P-A-T-E !>> Did you anticipate Cocoa? otal.com Late to the party again!

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (28182)	2/16/2003 12:55:37 PM
From: philv	Respond to of 36161

You talk about intervention & manipulation of the Gold price, and in that regard I agree entirely with your statements. But it is the very fact of years of suppression and the anticipation of intervention that has and is holding down the POG now and in the future that gives a contrarian hope that one day this con game will have to end. It has happened before. Sustained physical demand will eventually overcome any attempt at holding down the price of gold. Any attempt. The paper game is reflected in the physical price, and will be subservient to the physical always. Its a small market, and anything can happen. When the French demanded payment in Gold rather than dollars, the US reneged, stopped the gold transfer to France, and revalued the dollar. If there is enough demand, something has to give. JW-CB is trying to look into the future, the end game, the relationship between Fiat, Gold, Commodities and Debt. This long view causes extreme doubt that "they" know what they're doing, and everything will be fixed. It's a matter of confidence in the system. It's a CON game. Perhaps the differences in outlook is simply one of long term vs. shorter term, long trends vs. short trends & momentum. A picture is worth a thousand words, and worth a second look; so I conclude thanks to habitrail for posting. Message 18585953 Phil

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (28182)	2/16/2003 1:13:40 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

John Hathaway of Toqueville has expressed his opinion on CB's he claims Central Banks have begun to purchase gold their tactics have changed and you have not noticed they will get assistance from COMEX on margin rules they will assist the Miners and Gold Bankers but only to assist the cartel in easing out of disastrous shorts eventually, it becomes in the best interest of Central Bankers to support the large gold reserves THEY DO HAVE eventually, CB's will sacrafice bullion & miner shorters CB's have a bigger fish to fry managing the collateral in their own currency and sovereign debts they will let the gold cartel twist, turn, groan, and die why do you rail on Sinclair? because he was right and you were wrong? in December Sinclair said "when #330 breaks, it will run high" in January Sinclair said "when #350 breaks, it will run to #400" it went to #390 in late December, Slider said "sell at #350, the top" it went to #390 it now uses your high call as support at #350 the record is clear you are losing both credibility and integrity in my view / jim