SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (28784)2/16/2003 11:21:25 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Thinking along these waves, Blair and Bush always call Hussein by his first name, Saddam. Why is that? Do Hussein Saddam and Udey call Blair Tony and Bush George?

Because Saddam doesn't have a last name. Hussein is a patronymic - Saddam [son of] Hussein. Saddam's son's are called Uday Saddam and Qusay Saddam.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (28784)2/16/2003 11:34:22 AM
From: JHP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
HOW MANY FRENCH DOES IT TAKE TO DEFEND PARIS???
NOBODY KNOWS...IT'S NEVER BEEN TRIED



To: TobagoJack who wrote (28784)2/16/2003 11:54:29 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay -

Yes, I am boycotting French everything, which in reality only means French brie and movies starring Gerard Depardieu, helas.

We are right in the middle of a blizzard, which is why I own the Rover. Last time we had a blizzard, Ben got sick and we had to walk two miles to the pharmacy in knee deep snow to pick up his prescriptions because the car we had then did not have four wheel drive. Also, my hobbies are gardening and home renovation, and it's great for hauling stuff. Trees, bushes, rolls of sod, bags of fertilizer, bricks, rocks, pressure treated lumber, boxes of oak strip flooring, you name it, I haul it. I can pull trailers, too.

I have no intention of selling it, as it has over 100,000 miles on the odometer, so the resale value isn't favorable. I'll drive it until it falls apart, and have no idea what I'll buy then. I was thinking Volkswagen but am ticked off at the Germans, too, now, and may get a Saturn. They just started making SUVs. I am not mad at the Japanese. Or maybe a Volvo. I am not mad at the Swedes, either. Hopefully, when the Rover falls apart, it will be five or more years down the road, so who knows who I'll be mad at then?

Gold is down (relatively), crude oil is down (relatively), TEOTWAWKI seems to be taking a long time to get here.

P.S. Bush pronounces Saddam as "sodom," as in sodomite. ;^)



To: TobagoJack who wrote (28784)2/16/2003 7:36:12 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 74559
 
<Are you not as confused as I am muddled?>

Jay, I am confused, muddled and bewildered, but it's nothing to do with all that stuff you mentioned. Those blokes all seem to performing to my expectations.

My confusion, muddlement and bewilderment are more to do with my own position within the whole. I'm a butterfly who took off a while ago, but while some butterflies can take off in a Siberian forest and thereby cause a hurricane in the Caribbean, I feel a bit more like the feather in Forrest Gump - drifting on the winds of fortune, with little awareness of where all the breezes are coming from, so it's difficult to know where to point the tip of my feather to get the optimum lift.

I find a little luck goes a long way - a bit like Forrest did.

This next question is easily answered:

<What is money for if not to be used for German cars, French fois gras, Belgian chocolate, Venezuelan oil, Japanese largess, Chinese renaissance, or Russian ladies? Complete TFCO2001, absolute TeoTwawKi, and positively TwoAPuc.

International electorates want to know, yet are not waiting for the predictably nature answer and practically obvious response....
>

You know the answer Jay. It's for cdma2000 phragmented photon light sabre cyberphones bringing peace, light, harmony, happiness, health, wealth, longevity, fun and love - plus that thing you tossed into the mix [I forget what it was].

The purpose is for We the Sheople to create a new virtual world in cyberspace; a United States of Freedom. A community of interest to replace the atavistic tribal, territorial alpha males MAD madness of the 20th century.

We all know we want it - which is why cyberspace is so universally loved. Like neurons in a new-born clicking into place as they experience reality, the neural net of the cyberspace world is clicking into place as the zygote of It develops.

The USA is confronting the reality that the UN is no good, they don't want to go it alone and have an American Empire, which leaves a newly constructed United States of Freedom to replace the antiquated United Nations WWII Victors' Club. It'll come because there's no other answer.

"The Best is Yet to Come". [Irwin Jacobs, 2003 Annual Report].

Mqurice



To: TobagoJack who wrote (28784)2/16/2003 9:25:05 PM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 74559
 
>>Given Greensputin’s record on timing, with “irrational exuberance” and such musty thoughts, we may have up to 5 years before the event singularity T-Pon-Rrr, marking the progression continuum of TeoTwawKi.<<

Speaking of timing -- yessiree!! --

we have no stagflation in sight

OR

how to break your arm patting yourself on the back

>>Texas Representative Ron Paul: “I have a question relating to the speech that you gave at the economic club in New York in December. Because you introduced your speech with three paragraphs dealing with gold and the -- and monetary policy. And you made some very pertinent points about gold, indicating that from the year 1800 to 1929 the price levels were essentially stable under gold. And after we got rid of the gold restraint on the monetary authorities, prices have essentially increased by over tenfold since that time. But you also follow that by indicating that inflation, when it was out of control in 1979, monetary policy changed direction in a way, and they were able to take care of inflation, more or less conquer inflation, and that now you are more or less not concerned about inflation, that your concern, really, is about deflation. And it was interesting that you brought up the subject of gold, of course. And there’s a lot of speculation as to exactly why you did this and what this means.

But my question deals with whether or not we should forget about inflation, whether or not this has been dead and buried. Federal Reserve credit for the last three months has gone up at the rate of over 28 percent. Inflation is a monetary event, so therefore we have monetary inflation. The median CPI is almost going up at twice the rate as the CPI, close to 4 percent. The Commodity Research Bureau index is going up in the last 15 months over 35 percent. Gold is up 36 percent over 18 months, or 15 months. Oil is up 60 percent. So we have a lot of inflation. And we have medical care costs skyrocketing, housing costs going up, the cost of education going up, the cost of energy going up. And to assume that we shouldn’t be concerned about inflation, all we can do now is print money, I would suggest that this is what we’ve been doing for three years, the monetary authorities. We’ve ... you’ve lowered the discount rate 12 times, and there's still no signs of good economic growth. So when - when will you express the concern about an inflationary recession? Because that to me seems like our greatest threat, because that has existed before, we even had a taste of it in the ‘70s. We called it stagflation. So I’d like you to comment on that as well as follow on your comments on just why you might have brought up the subject of gold as the New York speech.

Chairman Greenspan: “First of all, we have not lessened our concerns about inflation. Indeed, our general presumption is that we seek stable prices. And stable prices mean no inflation or deflation. The reason I raised the issue of gold is the fact that the general wisdom during the period subsequent to the 1930s is that as we moved to essentially a fiat money standard, that there was no anchor to the general price level. And, indeed, what we subsequently observed is, as you point out, a very marked increase in general price levels, indeed, around the world as moved ourselves from commodity standards, and specifically gold. I had always thought that the fiat money system was chronically and inevitably an inflation vehicle, and indeed, said so repeatedly.

I have been quite surprised, and I must say, pleased by the fact that central bankers have been able to effectively simulate many of the characteristics of the gold standard by constraining the degree of finance in a manner which effectively has brought down the general price levels. The individual price levels to which you allude are certainly correct. I might say the gold and the oil issue are clearly war related and not fundamental. But we still -- looking at the broadest measures of average inflation, and the best statistics that we have, still indicate very low inflation with no evidence of an acceleration. That does not mean, however, that we believe that inflation is somehow inconceivable anytime in the future. We will maintain a considerable vigilance on the issue of inflation, and are looking all the time for evidences of an emergence of inflation, which at this particular time we do not see. But that does not mean that we believe inflation is dead and that we need not be concerned about it. We will continue to monitor the financial system as best we can to make certain that we keep prices stable. They are stable now, and we hope to be able to continue that indefinitely into the future.”
<<

From Noland's Credit Bubble Bulletin