SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (8712)2/15/2003 9:51:18 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 25898
 
<United Democratic Nations>, well, neither USA nor UK would have any access, major problem.

both would form the "United PseudoDemocratic Nations", aka as UPDN.

USA having the seniority position in the "Dangling Chad" committee with Jim Crow as
the honorary senior chairman, with a portrait of Jerry Mander behind him, waiting for
soem major reform so that Jimmy Carter could oversee the elections.

UK would be the perpetual pre+puberty tenor of the "me have no constitution for the colonies
nor the bananas" barber shop club, and the chair of the "no constitution at all or just
some really old one" club.

How are things with the education in USA?? Just as bad as long time ago??
Judgess Ginsburg (no bare Ashcroft tits) have not yet got the message through that luckily
no nation have adopted neither the US political nor legal system??



To: Brumar89 who wrote (8712)2/16/2003 12:03:05 AM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
>>>"Why not ... create a United Democratic Nations?<<< Are you sure there isn't such a group within the existing structure of the UN? If not, I think there should be. Not a bad idea!