Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (4187)	2/16/2003 6:16:36 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 15987

Dear Kumar and Michele, fadt TOU #5. Enjoy, fresh from the Cybershot. LOL... acute.ath.cx

To: kumar who wrote (4187)	2/16/2003 7:33:02 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Kumar. You said...." If 20 Hindus/Christians/Sikhs/<whatever> did a crime of equivalent significance, would one be right in blaming the whole faith ? '..... IMO. If the rest of whatever faith did not openly condemn the actions of the twenty then yes the entire faith must except some blame. Also if whatever faith has in it's written structure verses that tell followers to kill innocent people and that religion does not change violent verses then yes they must all except some blame.