Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (221755)	2/16/2003 5:52:37 PM
From: r.edwards	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

imo,, Launch the attack this friday,.moon phase...eom

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (221755)	2/16/2003 6:31:22 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Good. Now someone tell Rummy ... [edit] Whoops, maybe not: Rice: Bush won't back down on Iraq cnn.com

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (221755)	2/16/2003 6:39:00 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

WLD- with all due respect, I don't see where you get the U.S. is "backing down" in any way on Iraq/immenent attack.. Just 'cause U.S./U.K are seeking another resolution, concurrently while setting things up for attack does not mean they are backing down. Blair maybe created a little wiggle room to step back from joining U.S. this weekend, but not much. Brits are irrelevant anyway, Bush has been clear that this is not about a popularity contest, nor needing allies..U.S. made this decision (to attack Iraq) based on the assumption that they'd be alone, IMO All I'm seeing is continued diplomatic maneovering to squeeze out more support (quasi-U.N mandate), nothing more...we go with or without it..