SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oeconomicus who wrote (153097)2/17/2003 11:29:02 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
The US cannot bluff about war. There is no turning back. Saddam is likely to stay right where he is. If he does, then the US must invade because the level of bellicose chest-thumping leaves no option. There is no question about that. The ONLY question has been, from the beginning, about the price we will pay. And the way the US has played its cards has maximized the cost of war. We have all but destroyed the goodwill we enjoyed after 9/11. In dollars, deaths, future vulnerability, our leadership standing in the world, and in our national security, the policies of the US under Bush have taken us down the most expensive path we could have followed. Cheer all you like -- but this is a mess.



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (153097)2/17/2003 5:53:38 PM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>> the UN could actually be strengthened - it could become an institution that actually stands for something beyond idle talk and free illegal parking in NYC. <<

what a crock. the UN will never enforce the scores of resolutions against israel. so the UN will never be relevant. you're such a hypocrite, buschman. you want the UN relevant when it suits you and your brethren, but not when it suits the oppressed palestinians.