Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (4275)	2/17/2003 12:51:31 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 15987

plagiarized is as relevant as post graduate in the analysis of the validity of the report. I am surprised you do not see how you violate your own logic and rational by highlighting plagiarized. I heard there are still tons of chemical and biological material that is not accounted for. Also destroying thousands of chemical weapons munitions is not (1) Inspectors destroyed tens of thousands of tons of chemical and biological material It seems posting links that don't support what you claim is another method you attempt to win arguments. Your cite. iiss.org Weapons inspectors destroyed tens of thousands of chemical weapons munitions but thousands more are unaccounted for. If there is more than ZERO, nothing has changed? I will observe that misrepresenting the contents of cited information is a dishonesty that is relevant to credibility.