SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 7:41:36 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
OSC target Mark Valentine shared trading authority on his unfortunate futures account with Mike Paulenoff, a futures trader, author and market commentator. Mr. Paulenoff also provided commentary to JagNotes, a penny stock named in Bermuda Short. more...

Stockwatch News Item
Ontario Securities Commission (C-*OSC) - Street Wire
OSC target Valentine shared account with Paulenoff
Ontario Securities Commission *OSC
Monday February 17 2003 Street Wire

by Brent Mudry

Mark Valentine, the target of several Canadian regulators and the inspiration for Operation Bermuda Short, may now be a pariah to some, but his regulatory baggage did not frighten everyone. A recent hearing before the Ontario Securities Commission revealed that Mr. Valentine, who managed to lose $7,800, or 15 per cent of his account, in one month trading Nasdaq index contracts, was not the sole author of his misfortune. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.)
That title is shared with Michael Paulenoff, a futures and commodities trader who co-authored The Business-One Irwin Guide to the Futures Markets. In a decision Monday extending Mr. Valentine's trading ban, the OSC notes that two weeks after he was first banned last July, he opened a nominee corporate account in the name of Q Corp. and was one of two designated trading officers on the account, personally guaranteeing each trade. Although the other trader is not identified in the decision, regulatory records show he is Mike Paulenoff. (As of Monday, Mr. Valentine is now banned from holding any accounts, any beneficial ownership or any interests in any accounts that are not opened in his name solely.)
There is no allegation that Mr. Paulenoff, a graduate of Michael Milken's ultimately disastrous Drexel Burnham Lambert brokerage, did anything wrong in dealing with Mr. Valentine. Mr. Paulenoff currently runs MJPstrategies.com, a Web site and trading advisory service for futures traders.
At the time the account was opened, with a $50,000 initial deposit, Mr. Valentine had been making lead headlines in the business pages of numerous Canadian newspapers, including The Globe and Mail and the National Post, amid his role in the collapse of Thomson Kernaghan, a once respected Bay Street brokerage shut down by regulators. The account was closed in the wake of Mr. Valentine's Aug. 14 arrest at Frankfurt's airport as a key target in Bermuda Short, a two-year FBI-RCMP penny stock bribery and money laundering sting. Mr. Valentine close out his account on Aug. 26 and took his proceeds of $42,235, suffering a $7,765 loss, trivial for a trader of his resources.
In the serendipity of financial markets, Mr. Valentine and Mr. Paulenoff already had at least one thing in common -- they were previously attracted to Jag Media Holdings, Inc., previously known as JagNotes.com Inc., a penny stock promotion. Mr. Paulenoff was one of the regular financial commentators featured on JagNotes' financial Web site.
JagNotes was also well known to authorities in Bermuda Short, the sting inspired by legendary penny stock shorter Mr. Valentine and his Bermuda front Paul Lemmon, who has since pled guilty. One of the Bermuda Short indictments involved three Thomson Kernaghan promotions: C-Me-Run, SoftQuad Software and JagNotes.com, with illicit Valentine-Lemmon involvement dating back to Dec. 13, 1999. (JagNotes.com's trading symbol was JNOT.)
"It was part of the conspiracy that the undercover agent's mutual fund would purchase approximately $9.4-million worth of CMER stock from Thomson Kernaghan and MARK VALENTINE. It was also a part of the conspiracy that the undercover agent and the co-operating witnesses would receive a 30% undisclosed cash bribe or 'kickback' for themselves from PAUL D. LEMMON and MARK VALENTINE on the $9.4-million purchase," states the grand jury indictment.
"It was also part of the conspiracy that PAUL D. LEMMON AND MARK VALENTINE would cause brokers to receive undisclosed kickbacks for manipulating and artificially increasing the prices of CMER, JNOT and SXML stock, and for maintaining the artificially high prices ... for a period of months by arranging for the sale of CMER, JNOT and SXML stock to customers of brokers whom PAUL D. LEMMON and MARK VALENTINE caused to be enlisted in the scheme by bribing them."
There is no suggestion, of course, that Mr. Paulenoff, who agreed to provide market commentary content for JagNotes, had knowledge that Mr. Valentine was in the midst of any unsavoury dealings with the penny stock.
bmudry@stockwatch.com

(c) Copyright 2003 Canjex Publishing Ltd. stockwatch.com

old url (better for printing)



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 8:45:22 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
RE:Spam Email from Jonathan Lebed. "We purchased an email list you subscribed to and we are emailing you this one time only. You will never be emailed by us again."

================================================

While the market has been falling OPLO has made a run in the recent weeks from $0.07 to $0.19. We expect to see it above $0.50 soon.

Read the recent news releases. We believe that OPLO is going to be a big winner. Here is some information on the company:

OrderPro Logistics, Inc.
OTC BB: OPLO
Current Price: $0.19
Target Price: $0.50
52-week Range: $0.01 - $2.00
Shares Outstanding: 10M
Public Float: 5M
Market Cap: $1,900,000

OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTC BB: OPLO) is an innovative cutting edge, development-stage, company based in Tucson, Arizona. OrderPro Logistics provides cost-effective logistics solutions and complete transportation services; such as, freight brokerage, on-site logistics management, packaging assessment, process improvement consulting, claims management, private fleet management and full-cycle shipping and procurement cost assessment management, for the $255 billion per year U.S. Trucking Industry.

In order to provide the greatest cost savings possible to the industry, OrderPro Logistics has developed “OrderPro” its proprietary web-based software. “OrderPro” provides complete real-time logistics management services and manages all shipping processes.

OrderPro Logistics became public in 2000 through a reverse merger with a public shell and presently has 12 employees. The company was approved for trading in September of 2002, opened at $2.00 per share and now trades at $0.19 per share. We believe OrderPro Logistics is very undervalued at $0.19 and suspect that the drop in stock price is due to early-stage investors, who needed money, finally being able to liquidate their stock into a thinly traded market.

Richard Windorski, President and CEO of OrderPro Logistics is aggressively growing the company through strategic acquisitions in an attempt to build a $50 million per year revenue base. OrderPro Logistics is quickly taking steps to not only increase service capacity but also their customer base. OrderPro Logistics has acquired Great Plains Transportation, who currently operates seven power units. OrderPro Logistics plans on increasing them to 21 power units which will generate $3 million in revenues with the possibility of an additional $2 to $4 million in revenues with the signing of third-party logistics (3PL) contracts. OrderPro Logistics has also signed a letter of intent to acquire TransMex/USA and is currently negotiating two additional acquisitions.

OrderPro Logistics can implement a 3PL program that works with other companies to develop a comprehensive project plan, deploy a project team to initiate the plan and remain with the company throughout the process. OrderPro Logistics will evaluate existing processes, from initiation of an order through completion, and can provide on-site management services. The 3PL program allows companies to operate more efficiently and lower operational costs, while OrderPro Logistics signs revenue sharing agreements.

OrderPro Logistics revenues for 2003 could reach $10 million, with the acquisition of Great Plains Transportation, the letter of intent to acquire TransMex/USA, and other pending acquisitions. The current market cap is only a small fraction of potential sales.

OrderPro Logistics is extremely undervalued at the current levels with huge upside potential. However, an investment in OrderPro Logistics is still very speculative being that it is a start-up and will be required to raise capital to fund operations and acquisitions. OPLO stock is also very thinly traded and can be volatile.

Richard Windorski has been following through with everything he has promised; his experience and expertise in the industry lead us to believe that OrderPro Logistics will succeed. Windorski has proven over the years that transportation and logistics management can be successful in a competitive marketplace. At the current levels, OPLO stock is very attractive, and the potential for return outweighs the risks. Not many people have heard about OrderPro Logistics, but as the investment community begins to learn about this unique opportunity OPLO will begin to move higher.

We purchased an email list you subscribed to and we are emailing you this one time only. You will never be emailed by us again.

This email was sent by Lebed & Lara, LLC. Lebed & Lara, LLC, has signed a 12 month contract with OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OPLO), to provide investor relations services. Lebed & Lara, LLC, is receiving one-hundred thousand (100,000) shares of restricted OPLO stock as compensation for these services. Lebed & Lara, LLC, is not a financial advisor. This email is meant for informational purposes only and does not provide any kind of financial advise. Lebed & Lara, LLC, is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst, or underwriter. The information contained on this site is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell securities. This email contains forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. OPLO's actual results could differ materially from those described in any forward - looking statements or announcements discussed in this email.
0656jddl7



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 3:01:51 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
CRIMINAL AND CONMAN REGIS POSSINO TAKES UP FLIGHT WITH L-AIR HOLDING, INC. (OTCBB: LAIR.)

Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information Name: GENEVA EQUITIES LTD. Type: Corporation File Number: C27044-2001 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: October 05, 2001
Status: Initial list of officers filed Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. (Accepted)
Address: 2533 N. CARSON STREET
CARSON CITY NV 89706
President: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Secretary: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Treasurer: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706


L-AIR HOLDING, INC. (OTCBB: LAIR), Part II – AU REVOIR FRANCE, BONJOUR BELGIUM February 17, 2003

These would seem to be discouraging times for the airline industry. A poor economic climate, rising fuel costs, and the after effects of September 11, 2001 have created a crisis for many carriers. So why would anyone want to get into the airline business just now? L-Air Holding, Inc. (OTCBB: LAIR) seems determined to get up and flying. The Company already has something in common with operating airlines – money problems. As of August 31, 2002 L-Air had no cash, and there is no sign that it has become financially sound in recent months.

Still, as we saw in Part I of this series, in October 2002, L-Air announced its plan to acquire an interest in a French-based regional airline. That deal was terminated in February 2003, but the Company still clings to its dreams of a future in aviation. What’s next for L-Air? If it’s February, this must be Belgium.

An Airline Sprouts in Brussels

If at first you don’t succeed, fly, fly again. At least that seems to be the approach adopted by L-Air. On February 11, 2003, the Company announced that it had entered into final negotiations for 49% of Brussels, Belgium-based Belgium Universal Airline. The Company’s press release stated that all necessary steps had been taken to secure an “Air Operating Certificate” from Belgian aviation authorities.

But just what was the Company obtaining? Did Belgium Universal Airline have any assets – other than its name? The press release provided few details, and the Company has yet to file a Form 8-K or audited financial statements relating to the proposed acquisition.

According to the February 11th announcement, the airline would commence operations in April 2003, utilizing management and flight personnel from Belgium’s defunct national airline, Sabena, including a former Sabena pilot identified as Raymond Nicholai. L-Air did not indicate who would own the remaining 51% of the carrier, although it explained that the majority interest would be held by Europeans, in order to comply with existing requirements for European-based airlines.

Plans for the airline appear to be ambitious. According to the February 11th press release, the airline will operate a fleet of five Airbus 340-300 aircraft with First Class, Business Class and Economy sections, serving destinations in Asia, Middle East, Africa, USA, Canada, Caribbean and Europe. The Company claims its planes will have various amenities, including state of the art video and audio systems.

But while creature comfort and amenities are an admirable goal, and diverse routes sound appealing, there is no indication that the Company, or Belgium Universal Airline, presently owns or leases any aircraft – of any configuration. Indeed, we have been unable to find any sign that Belgium Universal Airline is an existing, operating air carrier, operating commercial planes, employing air and ground personnel, or maintaining a presence at any airport terminal.

The Company believes it can establish a niche as a small carrier servicing long-haul routes with low maintenance aircrafts. To support that view, it notes that “commitment to cost efficiencies and customer satisfaction is at the core of its business model, just like JetBlue” and other small regional services. The Company’s Internet site declares that L-Air is “destined to become the ‘JetBlue’ of Europe.”

Still, L-Air has not addressed critical problems that may confront this enterprise – starting with the Company’s lack of capital. As we noted previously, at last report L-Air had no money. Compare that with JetBlue. By the time it went public, Jet Blue was operating 108 flights per day and serving 19 cities. It maintained a fleet of new aircraft, and had raised $175 million in private equity transactions before its $165 million Initial Public Offering.

On the other hand, so far the Company has generated nothing but L’Air.

All’s Fare

On February 13, 2003 L-Air issued a press release announcing that Belgium Universal Airline had entered into an agreement to operate a weekly flight for a Belgian tour operator called VGAA.NV. The flight would travel from Brussels to Los Angeles, with stops in Yeravan, Armenia and Lyon, France.

The Company projected that the flights would generate revenues of $18 million a year, at a rate of $360,000 per week. It said that it had finalized negotiations to lease two Airbus A340-300 airplanes from an unnamed “major manufacturer,” and planned to start flying as soon as it received approval from the Belgian authorities.

Is this consistent with the Company’s commitment to “cost efficiencies?” A typical Airbus A340-300 airplane seats roughly 250 to 300 passengers. A full plane, carrying 300 passengers, would have to charge an average of $1,200 per person in order for the Company to receive $360,000. Of course, the per passenger cost will be even greater since this does not include the tour operator’s profit. As a practical matter, is VGAA.NV likely to fully book a plane each week, at these costs? How much will it cost the Company to operate each flight, lease the planes and purchase fuel? None of these questions are addressed in the February 13th press release.

Plenty of Partners

So far, the Company has not demonstrated any ability to raise sufficient funds to operate its business. It has, however, managed to find the means to promote its latest plans. On February 5th the Company issued a press release announcing that it had retained a company called Geneva Equities Ltd. to develop investor awareness and “contribute to funding, analyzing, structuring, negotiating and financing business acquisitions, joint ventures, alliances and other desirable projects of great value to the Company and its shareholders.”

The press release claimed that the relationship with Geneva Equities would “facilitate” the Company’s ability to raise the financing necessary to finalize its latest acquisition. It did not indicate how this might be accomplished. Nor did it identify any of the individuals involved with Geneva Equities, explain how the Company had developed the relationship, specify how Geneva Equities would be compensated for its services, or say where this new business partner was located. We were unable to find any details about Geneva Equities, although we did learn that a business using that name sought office space in Santa Monica, California in September 2002.

The Company also has referred to its relationship with a Toronto, Canada-based company called Universal Capital Partners (UCP). In its February 11th press release, the Company said that UCP was negotiating the acquisition of Belgium Universal Airline. It also identified UCP as the Company’s single largest shareholder.

That information seems to be at odds with the Company’s previous public disclosures. According to documents filed with the SEC, there were approximately 22.3 million shares of common stock outstanding as of August 31, 2002. Publicly filed documents indicate that the Company’s President, Alex Goldman of Toronto, Canada, is L-Air’s largest shareholder, with 15 million shares. He acquired that stock from his predecessor as president, Robert Rosner, in September 2002.

Stock Patrol readers may remember Robert Rosner as the President, Chairman of the Board, and largest shareholder of Money Club Financial, Inc., another struggling over-the-counter company with grand plans and virtually no cash. See Money Club Financial, Inc. – Money Business or Monkey Business?

And what is Universal Capital Partners? UCP is an investor relations firm located at 130 King Street West, Suite 3670, Toronto, Canada – the same office address and suite occupied by L-Air. UCP, L-Air, and Belgium Universal Airline also share a common telephone number.

UCP’s business, according to information we found on its website, is to help clients increase their profile with brokers, institutional investors, and the general public. In other words, the entity identified as the Company’s largest shareholder is in the promotion business.

The UCP website identifies two of the firm’s clients, one of which is L-Air. It does not, however, indicate that UCP owns L-Air stock. Is Alex Goldman associated with UCP, and if so, in what capacity? The UCP website does not say – and fails to identify who controls or manages that entity.

L-Air may welcome its associations with UCP and Geneva Equities, but the Company says that there are some relationships it wishes to sever. On October 30, 2002, L-Air announced that it had amended its Articles of Incorporation to prohibit its transfer agent from registering common shares in the names of the Depository Trust Company (DTC) or other securities clearing houses. DTC is the world’s largest securities depository, and provides a clearinghouse for the settlement of transactions.

The Company claimed that it was taking this action in order to force short sellers to cover their positions by purchasing shares in the open market. Theoretically, if shares held by DTC were distributed to brokerage firms, the brokers would discover that there were fewer certificates than shares outstanding, and could demand that investors buy stock to cover their short positions. It is not clear, however, that there has been significant naked short selling of the Company’s stock, or that the Company can circumvent the securities clearinghouses like DTC.

Investors Respond

If increasing investor interest was a goal, the Company certainly succeeded with its string of recent press releases. Those announcements may not establish that Belgium Universal Airline is an operating venture, or explain how a cashless company can finance an airline, but they apparently have generated activity for L-Air stock.

L-Air shares, which closed at 16 cents on February 6th (the day after the Company rescinded its plans for a French regional air carrier) soared to 22 cents a share on February 11th, the day the Company disclosed plans to acquire a piece of Belgium Universal. Share prices rose to 25 cents on February 13th, the day the Company announced its agreement with VGAA.NV. Once again, investors were content to purchase stock based upon minimal details of a vaguely defined relationship.

Volume has been increasing as well – from just 7,500 shares on February 5th to 474,300 on February 10th, 532,500 on February 11th and more than 1 million shares on February 13th.

For investors, the principal questions remain. Will there be a functioning airline? Where will it fly, and how will it pay the bills?

In other words, will the Company and its public shareholders be flying high or will Belgium Universal, and L-Air, be another aero-flop?

©2003 Stock Patrol.com. All rights reserved.

WE'RE BACK ON PATROL

L-AIR HOLDING, INC. (OTCBB: LAIR), Part I – THE PLANE TRUTH February 15, 2003
These are difficult times for the airline industry. Revenues are down, fuel costs are up, and passengers remain skittish about air travel. Increased security measures have created airport delays, and decreased airline services have prompted people to seek other means of travel.

The airlines are reeling. Some carriers in the U.S. have sought government loan guarantees, while others around the world teeter on the brink of bankruptcy or outright collapse.

So why is a tiny company called L-Air Holding, Inc. (OTCBB: LAIR) so keen to get into the airline business? So eager, in fact, that it recently announced its second attempt to acquire a European-based airline. L-Air Holding has no money, no revenues, and as best we can determine, no experience in the ownership or management of an air carrier.

Then again, it seems that the “airline” it is trying to acquire has no operating history and no planes.

Is this any way to run an airline?

Feeling Superior

L-Air’s interest in airlines represents a change of direction for the Company which, until recently, was known as Superior Networks, Inc. This latest venture marks a dramatic departure from the Company’s earlier business plan – an attempt to offer specialized training programs over the Internet.

The Company, which was formed in May 2000, planned to start out by providing driver training instruction over the Internet to senior citizens who were seeking to reduce their insurance costs by honing their driving skills. Superior Networks established an instructional website, called Superonlinetraining.com, and projected revenues based upon online advertising, course fees, and referral payments by insurance companies.

The Company had selected an unusual audience for its first Internet project; as a group, seniors do not utilize the Internet with the comfort or frequency of their younger counterparts. According to one study, as of the year 2000 only 13% of those over age 65 had Internet access, compared with 65% of those under age 30.

In any event, the Company’s Internet training business failed to develop, and Superonlinetraining.com (which no longer can be found on the Internet) never generated any revenues. As of August 2002, over eighteen months after it launched its website, the Company conceded that it lacked insufficient funds to commence development of its initial product. In fact, as of August 31, 2002, Superior Networks had no cash, did not anticipate generating any revenues in the near future, and had not identified any source for additional funding.

According to its Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended August 31, 2002, failure to raise necessary funds in the immediate future would “at a minimum, prevent [Superior Networks] from fully developing [its] initial product and, in the worst case, cause [its] business to fail.” In the past, the Company’s auditors have expressed substantial doubt over its ability to continue as a going concern in view of its precarious financial position.

With no money in its accounts, no products in its pipeline, and no revenues on the horizon, what was the Company going to do?

French Fried

On October 15, 2002, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing plans to operate a French-based discount airline serving the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean, West Africa and North America. Superior Networks explained that it had entered into negotiations to acquire a 49% interest in AltitudePlus, S.A.S., a French charter airline operating under the name L’Air, that recently had been acquired in bankruptcy proceedings by a company called AeroPlus. The Company said it would change its name to L.Air Holding, Inc., to reflect the new business. (And no, our proofreaders have not fallen asleep. Although the French charter airline apparently spelled its name “L’Air,” Superior Networks changed its own corporate name to “L.Air Holding, and refers to itself as “L-Air Holding” in various press releases. To simplify matters, we will refer to the Company as “L-Air”).

How would the Company pay for its interest in the airline? Superior Networks said that it intended to issue 12 million shares of its common stock to AeroPlus, which would continue to own 51% of the airline. Indeed, on October 21st the Company announced that it had appointed two new members to its Board of Directors, including Jean Marie Gras, the current President of L’Air (the French charter carrier) and AeroPlus.

Exactly what was the Company getting for its 12 million shares? Neither the press releases nor the October 15th Form 8-K enumerated the assets of the acquired business. Was the Company obtaining anything more than the use of the name L-Air? The Form 8-K did not provide any financial statements, but promised that they would be filed within sixty days of the acquisition.

On October 29, 2002, the Company issued a press release declaring that it had completed the acquisition, and was engaged in negotiations to obtain interests in other airlines. At the time, the Company’s President, Alex Goldman, had this to say:
This is a great time to begin operating the first French ‘Low Cost’ long haul Airline around the Globe.

Mr. Goldman did not elaborate upon the basis for his belief. Considering the myriad problems facing the airline industry, it is unclear why this would be a “great time” for a struggling, unproven, and financially challenged company to enter the business.

The October 29th press release went on to say that the Company would operate Airbus A340-300 aircrafts, offer competitive prices, and provide a superior standard of service. There was no indication, however, that L-Air owned or leased any aircraft at the time, or that it actually operated a commercial air service to any destination. The Company, which at last report had no money and no prospect of imminent funding, did not say how it would pay the cost of leasing or purchasing aircraft, or the other anticipated expenses of operating an airline, like salaries for pilots, ground crews and other airline personnel.

Nor were such financial concerns addressed in a November 6, 2002 press release which claimed that L-Air had signed a letter of intent “with ILFC” to lease three Airbus A300-200 aircraft, valued at more than $200 million, to be delivered by January 2003. The press release did not identify IFLC, but those initials are used by the International Lease Finance Corporation, a subsidiary of American Financial Group.

The November 6, 2002 press release also stated that the Company was negotiating with Boeing, for an additional six aircraft that previously had been used by Singapore Airlines. It did not say whether L-Air planned to lease or purchase those aircraft, or explain who would provide the necessary funding for these acquisitions.

In any event, L-Air said it would commence operating flights to the French Caribbean during the coming winter. On December 2nd the Company reaffirmed that plan, announcing the opening of its online reservation site, and promising that travelers could reserve flights to three French Caribbean destinations commencing December 16th.

It was unclear, however, whether the Company intended to open its reservation system on December 16th or commence flights on that date. Since the Company did not expect any aircraft to become available before January 2003, it seemed unlikely that flights could begin before that time. L-Air reinforced that notion in the December 2nd press release, stating that it would “be operational very soon,” but declining to specify any date.

L-Air also said that it was about to initiate an advertising campaign “worth $500,000” in major French cities. The Company, which still had not explained how the airline would be funded, did not say how it planned to pay for the advertising effort.

The December 2nd press release said that the Company expected to add additional destinations, including cities in India and Canada, once it had obtained necessary clearances and licenses. It did not state whether it had received clearance from any city – including those in the French Caribbean - or whether it had secured landing slots at any airport.

And where were the financial statements that the Company promised to file within sixty days of the acquisition? The Company had declared the transaction completed on October 29, 2002. As the calendar turned from December 2002 to January 2003, audited financial statements had yet to be filed with the SEC.

The answers to those questions would never come. Instead, on February 5, 2003 the Company disclosed that it had reversed the acquisition due to “administrative and judicial complications” resulting from “the lack of cooperation of the French Civil Aviation Authorities for the re-issuance of the Air Transport Certificate of L-Air in Lyon-France.”

The Company would not be flying L-Air after all.

But that didn’t mean the Company had abandoned its desire to operate an airline. According to L-Air’s President Alex Goldman, the Company was engaged in the final stages of negotiations to acquire a substantial interest in another European airline business.

Was this venture any more likely to take off? As we will see in Part II of this series, it was not long before the press releases were flying.

©2003 Stock Patrol.com. All rights reserved.

WE'RE BACK ON PATROL



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 3:09:46 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
BESIDES REGIS POSSINO STOCK CROOK JOHN SWITZER ALSO HIGH ON L-Air Holding, Inc
============================================

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17552 /June 10, 2002 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BRIAN M. VOLMER, JOHN R. SWITZER, INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE TRADING, INC., SUN PACIFIC CAPITAL GROUP, INC., Defendants, and LISA NEWMAN VOLMER, Relief Defendant, United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV 98-8698-JSL (Mcx) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BRIAN M. VOLMER, INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE TRADING, INC., SUN PACIFIC CAPITAL GROUP, INC., Defendants/Appellants, and LISA NEWMAN VOLMER, Relief Defendant/Appellant, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 00-57045

On May 3, 2002 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished opinion, affirmed a judgment against Brian M. Volmer and two corporate entities he controlled, International Alliance Trading, Inc. ("International Alliance") and Sun Pacific Capital Group, Inc., that was entered by the Hon. J. Spencer Letts of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on October 18, 2000. After a bench trial, Judge Letts found Volmer and his two companies liable for touting the stock of two issuers on the internet without disclosing the compensation they received from the issuer for doing so, in violation of the anti-touting provision of the securities laws [Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act")]. The District Court also found that in an advertisement they placed in a nationally distributed newspaper Volmer and International Alliance violated the antifraud provisions of the securities laws [Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder] by misidentifying the author of the ad, misrepresenting the assets of the issuer promoted in the ad, and falsely recommending the stock as a good buy. The judgment enjoins Volmer and his two companies from further violations of the anti-touting provision and enjoins Volmer and International Alliance from violating the antifraud provisions. It also orders Volmer to disgorge $296,429.13 in illicit proceeds (both his compensation and trading profits), and imposes a civil penalty against him in the same amount. Volmer's wife, Lisa Newman Volmer, who was named in the Commission's complaint as a relief defendant, was ordered to disgorge $106,646 she received from Volmer, if he fails to satisfy the disgorgement judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court in all respects. Another defendant in the case, John R. Switzer, previously consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from violating the anti-touting provision [Section 17(b) of the Securities Act]. The consent judgment against Switzer, which was entered on February 11, 2000, did not impose a civil penalty based upon Switzer's sworn representations concerning his financial condition. Investors are advised to read the SEC's "Cyberspace" Alert before purchasing any investment promoted on the Internet. The free publication, which alerts investors to the telltale signs of online investment fraud, is available on the Investor Assistance and Complaints link of the SEC's Home Page on the World Wide Web, www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/cyberfraud.htm. It can also be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330. Investors are encouraged to report suspicious Internet offerings (or other suspicious offerings) via e-mail to enforcement@SEC.gov. A user-friendly form to assist you in making a report is available at the Enforcement Complaint Center on the Enforcement Division link of the SEC Home Page, www.sec.gov. Investors can also mail a report to the SEC Enforcement Complaint Center, 450 Fifth Street, Washington, D.C. 20549-0213. See also Litigation Release No. 15952 (October 27, 1998).
sec.gov
Home | Previous Page Modified: 06/10/2002

==============================================

CONTACT:

Capital Consultants

John Switzer, 310/374-9777

==========================================
L-Air Holding, Inc. Announces $18 Million Contract With VGAA

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 13, 2003--L-Air Holding, Inc, (the "Company") (OTCBB:LAIR) announces it has executed a contract for the benefit of "Belgium Universal Airways" with the Brussels based Tour Operator VGAA N.V., with registered office at 400 Leopold I, represented by Mr. H. YERISTAN.

Under the terms of this agreement, Belgium Universal Airways will operate a route from Brussels to Yerevan with a stop in Lyon France then to Los Angeles (LAX) once a week with an Airbus A340-300 in a three class configuration for the benefit of VGAA N.V.

Belgium Universal Airways will receive as payment for this rotation the sum of US$ 360,000 per week in advance of the rotation. This will generate recurring annual revenue stream of over $18,000,000 for less than 40 hours of flight per week. An Airbus A340-300 has the capability of flying close to 120 hours a week. The Company has finalized negotiations to contract with a major aircraft manufacturer to lease immediately two A340-300's for its fleet operations.

The Airline plans to begin flight operations in April 2003, or as soon as its Air Operating Certificate will be approved by Belgium Civil Aviation Authorities. It will then operate two A340 Aircraft and will increase its fleet to five Aircrafts by the end of 2003.

The anticipated network BUA will be operating for the coming Spring/Summer season, including such destinations as Punta Cana (Dominican Republic), Toronto, Montreal, Delhi, as well as Yerevan Lyon and Los Angeles, all departing from Brussels. The fall/winter will see an addition of new destinations including Tokyo, Bangkok, Dubai, St Marteen, and Mauritius Island.

A highly qualified team of managers all trained and experienced from SABENA will lead this venture to reinstate a global network from Brussels, Belgium, which has traditionally been a major European Hub with NATO and the European Commissions based there. There hasn't been a major carrier based in Belgian since the closure of the Belgian national carrier, Sabena, after the collapse of its parent Company Swiss Air in 2001. This has left a vacuum at this important international hub, with major direct routes having gone under serviced. L-Air Holding, Inc., through its acquisition of Belgian Universal Airline, will once again revive many of these routes.

The Company has also amended its articles of incorporation to prohibit the registration of shares of New Common in the name of DTC or any other securities clearing house. The Company believes these registration restrictions may force speculators who have previously sold stock in naked short transaction to cover their prior short sale by purchasing stock in the open market.

About the Company - Belgian Universal Airlines (OTCBB:LAIR)

Europe needs a safe and decent, well run Airline, managed by highly qualified and experienced staff, that will provide good service at a fair price for everyone. Since the closure of Sabena in 2001 (the Belgian National Airline) due to Swiss Air's bankruptcy (Swiss Air had recently bought Sabena), there has been a need to revive the once thriving wide International Flight Network based in Brussels. In addition, since the September 11 tragedy, carriers that are not terrorist targets are increasingly being called upon to pick up these routes.

Through an acquisition of 49% of Belgian Universal Airways by OTCBB: LAIR, UCP and Sabena's Captain Raymond Nicolai are now preparing to meet this need. Universal Capital Partners (UCP) is currently negotiating with the airline to finalize an acquisition that will give 49% ownership to OTCBB: LAIR. UCP is the single largest shareholder of OTCBB: LAIR currently. This structure is necessary to meet ownership requirements mandating that 51% of a European air carrier be European owned.

Captain Raymond Nicolai has dedicated his life to Aviation since 1968. He is an ex-Belgian Air Force fighter pilot and is an instructor on many types of Aircraft including the company's chosen A340. Captain Nicolai is bringing many of the former Sabena management and staff that will comprise the bulk of the company's 200 plus in number workforce. These well-trained ex-Sabena staff members are dedicated to the Company's (OTCBB:LAIR) mission of creating a new Belgian National Airline that represents excellence in all aspects, including on-time flights, the highest level of customer service, cost efficiencies in operations and maximization of profitability for its investors.

With the addition of many new international direct routes to markets including Asia, Middle East, Africa, USA, Canada, Caribbean and Europe the Company has a better than average chance of achieving success due to the lack of any competition servicing these routes currently. Belgian Universal will operate a fleet of 5 Airbus A340-300 aircraft capable of seating 220 Economy seats, 30 Business class full comfort pitch seat, and 10 First class sleeperettes. All Belgian Universal's aircraft feature roomy seats each equipped with satellite phones and full individual multi-media systems capable of delivering many different forms of entertainment, including: a large selection of movies/videos, music (MP3 and other format), computer/video games, and the soon to be offered "on-board" Internet services. All available at every seat along with the many high-quality amenities not found on existing air carriers competing with the Company (OTCBB:LAIR).

With Belgian Universal, all seats are assigned, a good percentage of travel is ticketless, all fares are one-way, and a Saturday night stay is never required. For more information, schedules and fares, please visit www.l-air-holding.com. Press releases can be found on www.l-air-holding.com. Airline industry experts agree that the most promising source of revenue growth with the current political situation and insurance cost nightmare for U.S. and other majors is within the group of small carriers with high-traffic routes and low-maintenance cost aircraft. Focusing on profitable long haul routes with low-cost maintenance jets, while providing exceptional customer service, OTCBB: LAIR is one of these carriers. The Company's commitment to cost efficiencies and customer satisfaction is at the core of its business model, just like JetBlue (Nasdaq:JBLU), Southwest Air (NYSE:LUV), and easyJet.com, all of whom are very successful within their respective markets and industry leaders. This international carrier is on the path to success.

For more information, please contact Capital Consultants at 310-374-9777

www.L-Air-holding.com

The following constitutes a "Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussion with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made to involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. For a summary of such risks and uncertainties, see the Company's periodic reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CONTACT:

Capital Consultants

John Switzer, 310/374-9777

SOURCE: L-Air Holding, Inc.

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page. URL: businesswire.com

02/13/2003 09:32 EASTERN



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 3:34:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
BEFORE AND AFTER STOCK CROOK REGIS POSSINO. I HAVE BEEN WAITING AND TO DAY IS THE DAY.

Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information




Name: GENEVA EQUITIES LTD.

Type: Corporation File Number: C27044-2001 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: October 05, 2001
Status: Current list of officers on file Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. (Accepted)
Address: 2533 N. CARSON STREET
CARSON CITY NV 89706
President: MICHAEL RONIN
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Secretary: PEARL ASENCIO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706

Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information Name: GENEVA EQUITIES LTD. Type: Corporation File Number: C27044-2001 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: October 05, 2001
Status: Initial list of officers filed Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. (Accepted)
Address: 2533 N. CARSON STREET
CARSON CITY NV 89706
President: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Secretary: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Treasurer: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 3:42:56 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
IN PLACE OF REGIS POSSINO IS PEARL ASENCIO IN GENEVA EQUITIES LTD. BOILER ROOM STOCK THAON COMMUNICATIONS, INC TO HER CREDIT

8 Matches Found
Searching: PEARL ASENCIO | State: ALL
Purchase the Details:

OPTION 1: Buy for $19.95
OPTION 2: Buy Single Records for $9.95 (click on the record)


Results are sorted alphabetically by state. Scroll down to view.


THAON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. is a business entity in NV

CASTPRO.COM, INC. is a business entity in NV

THAON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. is a business entity in NV

ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. is a business entity in NV

DEEP EARTH, INC. is a business entity in NV

DRISCOLL & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. is a business entity in NV

CARDIGAN INVESTMENTS LLC is a business entity in NV

CORPORATE MARKETS LLC is a business entity in NV

Modify Search | New Search



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 3:57:26 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
THOAN AND PEARL ASENCIO THE BOILER ROOM FRONT OF REGIS POSSINO

Oddly enough, the Viennese bank to this day maintains a website despite the reported FBI probe and the international blacklist. At its website, www.gcbankag.com, the bank claims to have been in operation for more than 10 years now, and trading on the Vienna Stock Exchange. It even recommends investors to buy shares of Thaon Communications, Inc., an obscure company trading for a fraction of a penny on the OTCBB of the US NASDAQ.

AFTER:

Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information

Name: GENEVA EQUITIES LTD.

Type: Corporation File Number: C27044-2001 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: October 05, 2001
Status: Current list of officers on file Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. (Accepted)
Address: 2533 N. CARSON STREET
CARSON CITY NV 89706
President: MICHAEL RONIN
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Secretary: PEARL ASENCIO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706

before

Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information Name: GENEVA EQUITIES LTD. Type: Corporation File Number: C27044-2001 State: NEVADA Incorporated On: October 05, 2001
Status: Initial list of officers filed Corp Type: Regular
Resident Agent: LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. (Accepted)
Address: 2533 N. CARSON STREET
CARSON CITY NV 89706
President: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Secretary: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706
Treasurer: REGIS POSSINO
Address: 2533 N CARSON ST
CARSON CITY NV 89706

IN PLACE OF REGIS POSSINO IS PEARL ASENCIO IN GENEVA EQUITIES LTD. BOILER ROOM STOCK THAON COMMUNICATIONS, INC TO HER CREDIT

8 Matches Found
Searching: PEARL ASENCIO | State: ALL
Purchase the Details:

OPTION 1: Buy for $19.95
OPTION 2: Buy Single Records for $9.95 (click on the record)

Results are sorted alphabetically by state. Scroll down to view.

THAON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. is a business entity in NV

CASTPRO.COM, INC. is a business entity in NV

THAON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. is a business entity in NV

ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. is a business entity in NV

DEEP EARTH, INC. is a business entity in NV

DRISCOLL & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. is a business entity in NV

CARDIGAN INVESTMENTS LLC is a business entity in NV

CORPORATE MARKETS LLC is a business entity in NV

Modify Search | New Search

15-16 APRIL 2002 by SHEILA SAMONTE-PESAYCO

This two-part series documents the life and times—as well as the large-scale fraud—perpetrated by Amador Pastrana, a 30-year old Filipino who operates what could be the biggest scam syndicate in the world. Pastrana, who is based in Manila and Los Angeles, is the brains of a global network of boiler room operations that have duped thousands of investors who had little knowledge of the financial market.

This article traces Pastrana's rise from an impoverished student and telemarketer to head of a worldwide fraud syndicate. His story is also the story of how liberalized global financial flows, the stockmarket boom, and the dotcom bubble have provided fertile grounds for high-tech fraud. Investigators estimate that the Filipino has victimized thousands of people, including pensioners in Australia, New Zealand and even South Africa, where one of the owners of De Beers Diamonds fell prey to his schemes.

Published accounts say that Pastrana has earned about $6 billion from his network of 150 boiler room operations in nine countries, including the Philippines. These are called "boiler rooms" because they usually work out of cramped office spaces with desks and telephones and apply high-pressure sales pitches on their victims. Each office has an army of telemarketers that call up retirees, pensioners, lottery winners and then pitch stocks of "pinksheet" companies, or those whose shares sell for a fraction of a penny, listed on the unregulated Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) of the US NASDAQ.

THE OPERATOR of what could be the biggest scam syndicate in the world is a Filipino, authorities in various countries say.

Just 30 years old, Amador Apungan Pastrana, has become the face of 21st-century high-tech fraud. According to authorities here and abroad, he is the brains of a global network of boiler room operations that have duped hundreds of thousands of investors with little knowledge of the financial market, but with lots of money to spare.

Pastrana's alleged victims include 4,000 people who lost $35 million they invested in one of his shell companies, thousands of retirees in Australia and New Zealand, and nearly 700 South Africans who lost a total of $28 million, of which $5 million belonged to businessman Lino Leoni, one of the owners of the renowned DeBeers diamond company.

Accounts in the Internet and Australian newspapers say Pastrana has already amassed some $6 billion in a mere eight years, a wealth accumulated largely from running at least 150 boiler rooms in nine countries. But his operations have also earned him the ire of the police and the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SECs) in the Philippines, Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada and in some European countries. None, however, has managed to catch up with the slippery Filipino.

Pastrana, who maintains posh homes in Manila and Los Angeles, is now on the watchlist of authorities in many countries, including the Philippines. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has also begun to investigate his activities. Police in Austria want to talk to him, as well as to US national Regis Possino, a disbarred lawyer convicted of fraud and drug dealing, and shady Saudi Arabian businessman Adnan Khashoggi. Media reports say the three men were members of a consortium that bought a small Viennese bank without a brokering license, and then turned it into a boiler room.

But Tomas Syquia, acting director of the Compliance and Enforcement Division of the Philippine SEC, says building a case against the international syndicate is difficult because of the complexity of the modus operandi. Most of the victims are all overseas, making it hard and costly to gather information and court evidence.

As of this writing, the PCIJ has yet to hear from Pastrana or his legal representatives in Manila, to whom the Center sent a written list of questions.

Still, James Martin, director of Sydney-based Stock Investigation Research Society (SIRS), a network of victims of boiler room operators, says, "He (Pastrana) is the Henry Ford of boiler rooms. He has taken it into mass production scale like no one else."

Called "boiler rooms" because they usually work out of cramped office spaces with desks and telephones and apply high-pressure sales pitches on their victims, operations like that of Pastrana's can be found in practically every continent. Each office has an army of telemarketers that call up retirees, pensioners, lottery winners - anybody who's neither a banker nor a broker - who are thousands of miles away, and more than likely in another country. The glorified telemarketers then pitch stocks of "pinksheet" companies, or those whose shares sell for a fraction of a penny, listed on the unregulated Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) of the US NASDAQ.

These boiler rooms hire expatriates with Western accents who present themselves as hotshot brokers of securities firms that have impressive-sounding names such as Morgan Lynch (a cross of US investment banks J.P. Morgan and Merrill Lynch), Griffin Securities, Muller & Sons, Dukes & Company, and Knowle & Sachs. They send out glossy newsletters, put up Internet sites and pester the potential victim with follow-up calls until he agrees to part with his savings and buy the stocks. Clients, who plunk down amounts that range from $1,000 to $5 million each, then receive instructions on how to send the payment by telegraphic transfer to a bank overseas.

The companies collapse their operations after six months to a year or when too many clients itching to see returns start burning their phone lines. But like zombies, the firms come alive again in another office address or in another part of the world, using a different name and another set of incorporation papers. Often, too, the salespeople would say they are calling from Bangkok, Hong Kong or China, even if they are making the calls in, say, Manila.

Clients who try to cash in on their investments are never successful. More often than not, the boiler rooms do not really buy the shares and merely pocket the money. When the clients run to their respective SECs for help, they find out they have put their trust in obscure companies that do not even hold a license to trade stocks or a legitimate office address. Their phone calls go to business centers paid to render secretarial work and receive calls that are automatically re-routed to the boiler room's landlines.

Engineer Peter Harvey, who lives in the remote town of Kondinin in Western Australia, admits losing $150,000 from investing in OTCBB shares offered by boiler rooms allegedly owned by Pastrana. In an e-mail interview, Harvey recounts how he was first "sold" shares of companies believed to be part of Pastrana's own pinksheet empire, and then later told that his account was being transferred to another firm - and then another.

As Harvey tells it, he had first dealt with First Federal Capital, a company operating in Makati but based in Palau, in 1997. A year later, he was told his account was being transferred to Pryce Weston, which had supposedly bought First Federal. In 1999, another company called Saxon and Swift, which also had offices in Vanuatu and Hong Kong, took over Pryce Weston.

Harvey says the same thing happened with Bradshaw Global Asset Management, another boiler room company then based in Makati but with a representative office in Rancho Sta. Margarita in California. Some time in early 2000, Bradshaw's operations were taken over by Newport Pacific Securities and Management, also based in Makati. According to Harvey, Newport eventually ceased operations, and his account was moved to Gibson and Peterson Company, based in Bangkok.

"I even flew over to the Philippines to meet them and have a look at their operations," says Harvey. He says he did not find anything suspicious at the time. Now, though, he has only one word to describe these companies: "parasites."

Yet while Pastrana seems to be the present king of boiler rooms, he was not the inventor of this elaborate scam. Experts say boiler rooms began more than a decade ago in the United States, particularly in Florida, where they reportedly flourished due to lax investment rules there as well as the large population of retirees.

SIRS's Martin reckons boiler rooms boomed soon after 1990, when the US SEC allowed the trading of the so-called "Regulation S" shares. The policy, meant to respond to the increasing globalization of the capital markets, allows the sale of securities not registered with the US SEC to be sold to offshore investors. But Martin says what it has really done is to allow boiler rooms to mislead investors outside of the United States. These investors are led to believe they are being sold shares in legitimate US companies, and that the transactions have the seal of approval of US regulators. Coming at a time when stock markets were doing very well, the boiler rooms hit pay dirt in the hundreds of thousands of people eager to invest even their nest eggs.

When the FBI conducted a major sweep in the early 1990s, the boiler rooms simply moved their operations outside of the United States, eventually choosing countries that had no extradition arrangements with US law enforcement agencies, or with weak rules of law. Many of the boiler rooms thus set up their "dialing" offices in Canada, Hong Kong, the Bahamas, Panama, Costa Rica, Liberia and South Africa. Some apparently wound up in the Philippines, with one of them eventually employing Pastrana.

A BS Computer Science graduate of Trinity College in Quezon City, Pastrana had first worked as a crewmember in a McDonald's outlet before he chanced upon a newspaper ad for telemarketers in a Makati-based firm called Griffin Securities. It turned out to be a boiler room operation, but Pastrana lasted long enough in the company to master the "business." Some of his former employees were told that Pastrana took some vital diskettes with him when he resigned from Griffin. They believe he used these to help set up his first company, which became First Federal Capital.

According to the Philippine SEC records of AAP Management, Inc., his flagship company, Pastrana managed to have more than 10 companies in just a span of five years. It is believed these companies form part of his "legitimate" business and still do not include his boiler rooms. Among those listed as his previous positions were managing director of First Federal Capital, Inc. and president of Mendez Prior Hall, which authorities raided and were able to seize documents from showing the extent of its boiler room operations.

Today, Pastrana is said to own more than 100 boiler rooms and shell companies around the world. Some of them are incorporated in small tax-haven territories such as the Bahamas, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Mauritius, Cayman Islands, Western Samoa, Turks and Caicos, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Island of Nevis, and the republics of Liberia and Seychelles. Those in the United States were incorporated in Nevada, Florida, Delaware and South Carolina.

Martin, who says he was duped by Pastrana in an even more complicated way, has also received reports that Pastrana in the early 1990s had crossed paths with Sherman Mazur, a German national who was then running boiler rooms in the United States. In 1993, Mazur was sentenced to five years in prison in California for securities fraud. While he was serving time, Mazur reportedly passed on the management of his boiler rooms to Pastrana, "whom he trusted," says Martin. "But Amador not only took over these boiler rooms, (he) set up more."

Records obtained on Pastrana's US corporate empire as of June 2000, though, lists only seven OTCBB-listed companies created out of a series of reverse mergers and acquisition of dormant firms. The results are several holding companies operating only on paper, usually with the same corporate secretary, Roy Rayo, or Filipino lawyer Claudine Montenegro whom Martin also sued for practising in the US without a license.

The seven US holding companies are neatly spread out into different sectors. Apart from Digital Reach Holdings Corp., which takes care of investments, there is Key Holdings Corp., which was incorporated in Nevada, but is an "online gaming company based in Antigua or Dominican Republic." Netsat Holdings Ltd. is said to focus on telecommunications and Internet service, Your Future Holdings Inc. on educational development and technology, Labco Pharma on pharmaceuticals, and another Cayman-based holding company for food. There is also Stratasys, once owned by Martin but is now Pastrana's, which is a Bermuda-based holding firm supposedly handling software development.

The shares of these companies are listed on the OTCBB, which is highly vulnerable to price manipulation. Not surprisingly, these nearly worthless company stocks are among the offerings of Pastrana's boiler rooms. Harvey himself says he was among those who loaded up on Labco Pharma shares.

While the clients of his operations permanently part ways with their money, Pastrana has yet to stop raking it in. According to one of his former employees here in Manila, his companies' tills rang up a total of some $5 million a day in 2000. Other ex-employees say more than a third of that automatically went to Pastrana while only a tenth was used to buy legitimate stocks in behalf of clients.

A former resident of a squatter community in Guadalupe Viejo in Makati, Pastrana is now said to own a $2.8-million apartment penthouse on Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles, California.

"He also bought his mother a lovely gift: a $14-million house in Rancho Santa Margarita in Mission Viejo, California," says Martin. "A very nice son, don't you think?"

In the Philippines, his properties reportedly include two luxury condominium units in the high-end Essensa East in Taguig, a villa with a view of the sea in Caylabne Bay, the Winners restaurant on Arnaiz Avenue in Makati, and units at The Peak, also in Makati. Authorities hot on Pastrana's trail say some of the properties have been placed under the name of his front companies such as Euro Pacific Trade Inc., or those of members of his immediate family.

Pastrana's megabucks have also found their way into listed conglomerates such as Hong Kong's Hutchison Whampoa Ltd., as well as Singapore Telecoms, US metal producer Alcoa Inc., Pacific Cyberworks of Hong Kong, and US semiconductor firm Intel.

United Resources Asset Management Inc., which was set up in May 2000 and acted as investment manager for the entire Pastrana group of companies, had a portfolio of $200,000 invested in these stocks. In its first year of operation, the company targeted an investment of over $20 million a year, according to AAP Management records.

Some of his associates say that despite his supposed riches, Pastrana still has some simple joys, among them buying brand-name shoes at bargain prices in either Bangkok or Hong Kong. But he is also known for e-mailing his personal secretary to keep replenishing his stock of blue and black Mont Blanc pens, as well as showing off the results of his latest liposuction or the wonders cosmetic surgery has done on his face.

Obviously, too, Pastrana is making good a promise his former associates say he made to himself several years back. When he was still a struggling college student, Pastrana was said to have sworn in true Scarlett O'Hara fashion: "I shall never go hungry again."

H O M E | who we are | what we do | i on the net | e-community | e-bookshop

Copyright © 2002 All rights reserved.
PHILIPPINE CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM

15-16 APRIL 2002 by SHEILA SAMONTE-PESAYCO EVEN THE US Federal Bureau of Investigation is now looking into his companies' activities, but Pangasinense Amador Apungan Pastrana has managed to elude authorities across the globe who want to pin him down for the shenanigans of his alleged boiler room firms. "Indeed, Pastrana, who is said to head a global network of "collapsible" companies that hype nearly worthless stocks to gullible investors and then just suddenly close shop months later, remains free to enjoy the billions of dollars he is reported to have earned in the few years that he has been in business. And despite raids last year in Bangkok and Manila, boiler rooms still thrive in both cities as well as other places around the world. Authorities also admit that these operations have grown even more sophisticated as years pass. They say that the heads of some networks have even started to buy banks, intending to use these not only to launder their money, but also to use as centers for their boiler room transactions. James Martin, who claims to have lost $35 million to Pastrana in a completely different scam and now heads Sydney-based Stock Investigation Research Society (SIRS), says, "Those that were picked up by authorities (so far) were just small fry. They haven't gotten the big one (like Pastrana)." Authorities say that the big bosses of boiler rooms are hard to catch largely because the transactions cross borders, giving rise to questions on jurisdiction. Up until last year, in fact, US authorities seemed uninterested in checking boiler room operations, even if the stocks these firms were selling were those listed in the unregulated Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) of the US NASDAQ. Former boiler room employees themselves say that they were given strict instructions not to call anyone in the US or pitch shares to American citizens, fearing the long arm of US laws. It was only after US national Christopher Coppola was stabbed to death in Pasig last May that the FBI began scrutinizing boiler room operations, especially those linked to Pastrana. Coppola had reportedly been employed by a Pastrana boiler room in Manila. The PCIJ has learned that the U.S. Customs police is now also following leads that Pastrana has been laundering proceeds of his illegal operations by amassing properties in the United States. But Tomas Syquia, acting director of the Compliance and Enforcement Division of the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), echoes Allan Cantado of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) in saying that it is difficult to make a case against boiler room companies because of the inadequacies of local and international laws, and the sheer shortage of official manpower. Cantado points out, too, that in the Philippines alone, prosecuting agencies should first prove that the company does not really hold a license to deal with securities, and that the transactions really existed for a case involving violations of the Securities Regulations Code to prosper. "The problem is that the complainants are all foreigners and don't want to come here (to the Philippines)," he says. "They only send documents. Under our jurisprudence, victims have to physically appear before the fiscal to lodge a formal complaint." Cantado also does not rule out the possibility that boiler rooms get prior warnings before they are raided, leaving the police with little to show afterwards. "Considering that the syndicate is moneyed," he says, "it's not totally impossible that they pay off or have paid off insiders to tip them off" whenever a raid was or is going to be conducted. He suspects this is precisely what happened in an NBI raid of a Makati-based boiler room. Recounts Cantado: "When we came in, the coffee on their office desks was still hot. We found out they had left just minutes ago through the emergency exit at the back door." Yet in March last year, the Philippine SEC thought it finally had some goods on Pastrana after a raid on 88 Corporate Business Center in Makati. The bust had been conducted after a Saudi national who lost $48,811 to two boiler rooms lodged a formal complaint against the companies that duped him. According to the SEC, the raid on 88 Corporate Business Center established the interlocking relationships of boiler rooms linked with Pastrana: not only were several documents on the illegal stock brokering operations of 21 firms all found in one office, but they also share some names as incorporators. A month later, the SEC filed a criminal case with the Department of Justice (DoJ) against 21 companies and 14 individuals, including nine foreigners and John/Jane Does believed to be working as brokers or telemarketers. Among those charged with the criminal offense of running an operation that trades securities without a license were Pastrana, Rufina Abad, Noel Galang, Hilda Ronquillo, Greshiela Compendio and British national Gregory P. Barnes. The SEC thought it had an airtight case. Apart from documents, it was also able to gather sworn testimonies from witnesses who were privy to the inner workings of Pastrana's companies. But Pastrana's lawyers got an injunction order from the Regional Trial Court of Muntinlupa preventing the SEC, NBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ) from using documents seized from the raid as court evidence. The court ruled that the search warrant used to get the documents was invalid as it violated the legal procedure of stating only one offense. The court also charged the SEC and NBI for contempt after the agencies failed to return the documents within the deadline it imposed. With the documents declared inadmissible by the court, the DOJ last November decided to junk the case for lack of evidence. Those close to the case say the police in Hong Kong were dismayed to learn what had happened here. The week after the March 2001 raid in Makati, five Filipinos were arrested in a Hong Kong hotel for allegedly trying to launder some $50 million in proceeds from boiler rooms. All five were believed to be working for Pastrana, and were actually based in Manila. The Organized Crime and Triad Bureau of Hong Kong alleged that many of their victims had paid through Hong Kong accounts set up through company-formed agents there. Today, only one of the five Filipinos remains in detention, the rest having been released on bail. But one of Pastrana's ex-employees says the alleged boiler room mogul would have been among those caught in that Hong Kong raid had he not gone to the toilet just minutes before the police arrived. According to the former employee, Pastrana had even left his laptop and coat at the hotel lounge. Pastrana is said to have avoided alerting Hong Kong authorities about his departure for the Philippines by renting a private yacht for P10 million and using this for his trip home. Some observers speculate that the Filipinos would not have had the need to be in Hong Kong had the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas allowed Pastrana to keep the small Imus, Cavite-based thrift bank he bought two years ago. Although Pastrana's income tax returns for 1997 to 1999 showed he had "limited sources of income," the Bangko Sentral still concluded that he was "capable of investing" in the Northpoint Development Bank based on his declared assets and liabilities as of March 2000. But a "tip" from the banking industry that Pastrana and one of the bank's new directors, Rufina Abad, had an ongoing securities fraud case with the SEC prompted Central Bank authorities to dig deeper. Asked to explain these reports, the thrift bank, then already run by Pastrana, submitted a photocopy of an SEC order exonerating him and Abad from the criminal case involving an alleged boiler room, the First Federal Capital Inc. Upon verification with the SEC, the Central Bank discovered it had been given a forged document, as the SEC investigation into First Federal and Pastrana's other companies was still ongoing at the time. Because of this, coupled with reports that he was engaged in "nefarious activities," the Central Bank rejected the sale of Northpoint to Pastrana. Carmelita Climente, who has been president of Northpoint since its inception as a thrift bank in 1996, says businessman William Hernandez bought it from Pastrana last December. She says the new owner does not have links with Pastrana, and that the two have yet to meet in person. Climente denies having any knowledge of Pastrana's alleged boiler room operations. She says, "My only connection with him was through the bank… (When Pastrana left the bank,) I offered to resign but the Central Bank told me to stay out and run it." Climente admits, however, that Pastrana once tapped her as a consultant in setting up an investment house that would sell nonconvertible preferred shares to foreigners - which the SEC does not allow. She says nothing happened of the plans because "I was not for it." According to Climente, Pastrana had envisioned Northpoint to be a "technology bank" that would cater to the ATM needs of small banks. A prospectus of AAP Management, Inc. - Pastrana's flagship company - given to clients does say that what Pastrana had renamed as United Resources Bank (URB) "will be positioned as a full-technology bank that will capitalize on its relationship with Infoserve Inc., a leading software developer for the banking industry." (Infoserve is not a Pastrana company.) But the same prospectus indicates that Pastrana had more ambitious plans for the bank in which he had agreed to put in a fresh P400-million equity in December 1999. In truth, it maps out Pastrana's plans to transfer URB's head office from Cavite to Makati and then set up a branch in Ortigas Center, where most of his companies are located. By pumping in more cash and merging it with more banks, URB was envisioned to grow into a full-fledged commercial bank with a license to offer trust and foreign currency deposit products, hence freely catering to clients across borders. A former Pastrana employee says URB was supposed to take care of all the banking needs of Pastrana's companies, including the alleged boiler rooms, instead of giving out the business to other private banks. But lawyer Rodolfo Pineda, who was president of URB when it was still under Pastrana, denies knowing about any plans that would have the bank becoming a depository of any boiler room. Pineda says aside from incorporating some of Pastrana's companies, he merely helped Pastrana look for a bank to acquire. "When I met him, he said he made money from investing in the NASDAQ," says Pineda. "I didn't realize it was illegal until I heard about it in the news." Reports in the Austrian media, as well as in the Internet, reveal that Northpoint was not the only bank Pastrana had bought. These reports say Pastrana was part of a group that had bought WMP Bank AG in Vienna in November 2000. In August last year, newspapers in Vienna reported that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had started to look into "a gang of worldwide active financial artists who allegedly bilked a gigantic 15 billion Austrian schillings (US$1 billion) from clients." This syndicate turned out to be the new owner of WMG Bank AG - then already renamed General Commerce Bank (GCB). Internet reports then said that the bank had been converted into a brokerage house that had become the nerve center of the "large-scale scam." Citing an FBI dossier, the reports said the "perpetrators" of the scam were "Manila- and Los Angeles-based Amador A. Pastrana, the 'mastermind of the operations'… and US citizens Regis Possino and Sherman Mazur," as well as prominent Saudi arms merchant Adnan Khashoggi. Two months later, the Banking and Finance Commission of Belgium issued a public warning against the bank, which it said was offering investment instruments to Belgian and foreigners without a license. Various media reports say Austrian police raided the bank, which has since been closed. The reports had securities regulators in Australia, New Zealand and Thailand scrambling to include GCB in its blacklist of boiler rooms and warning investors not to deal with the bank. Oddly enough, the Viennese bank to this day maintains a website despite the reported FBI probe and the international blacklist. At its website, www.gcbankag.com, the bank claims to have been in operation for more than 10 years now, and trading on the Vienna Stock Exchange. It even recommends investors to buy shares of Thaon Communications, Inc., an obscure company trading for a fraction of a penny on the OTCBB of the US NASDAQ.



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 4:05:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
L-Air Holding, Inc. Announces Signature of Consulting Agreement

Business Editors

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 5, 2003--L-Air Holding, Inc, (the "Company") (OTCBB:LAIR) announces it has executed a consulting agreement with Los Angeles, California based Geneva Equities Ltd.

Geneva Equities Ltd. will contribute to funding, analyzing, structuring, negotiating and financing business acquisitions, joint ventures, alliances and other desirable projects of great value to the Company and its shareholders.

In order to facilitate the goals of the Company, Geneva Equities Ltd. shall develop and implement a Public Relation program developing investor relations through the use of multi-media technology, with the goal of enhancing market awareness of the Company for the benefit of shareholders.

Alex Goldman, President of the Company, which is also engaged in final negotiations to acquire a substantial interest in another European airlines operation, stated "The commitments and applications of this agreement will facilitate to reach the Company's aim to raise and generate the balance of the financing needed to finalize the acquisition and operations of this Air Carrier and will bring a global market exposure that will benefit to all the shareholders."

The Company has also amended its articles of incorporation to prohibit the registration of shares of New Common in the name of DTC or any other securities clearing house. The Company believes these registration restrictions may force speculators who have previously sold stock in naked short transaction to cover their prior short sale by purchasing stock in the open market.

The following constitutes a "Safe Harbor" statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussion with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made to involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. For a summary of such risks and uncertainties, see the Company's periodic reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

--30--jsw/cl*

CONTACT: L-Air Holding, Inc.

Alex Goldman, 416/863-0101

www.L-Air-holding.com

KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL CANADA

INDUSTRY KEYWORD: AEROSPACE/DEFENSE

SOURCE: L-Air Holding, Inc.

Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet

with Hyperlinks to your home page.

URL: businesswire.com

-0- Feb/05/2003 17:49 GMT



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/18/2003 4:21:12 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
BECUZ ITS CONMAN REGIS POSSINO->L-AIR HOLDING, INC. (OTCBB: LAIR), Part I – THE PLANE TRUTH
February 15, 2003

These are difficult times for the airline industry. Revenues are down, fuel costs are up, and passengers remain skittish about air travel. Increased security measures have created airport delays, and decreased airline services have prompted people to seek other means of travel.

The airlines are reeling. Some carriers in the U.S. have sought government loan guarantees, while others around the world teeter on the brink of bankruptcy or outright collapse.

So why is a tiny company called L-Air Holding, Inc. (OTCBB: LAIR) so keen to get into the airline business? So eager, in fact, that it recently announced its second attempt to acquire a European-based airline. L-Air Holding has no money, no revenues, and as best we can determine, no experience in the ownership or management of an air carrier.

Then again, it seems that the “airline” it is trying to acquire has no operating history and no planes.

Is this any way to run an airline?

Feeling Superior

L-Air’s interest in airlines represents a change of direction for the Company which, until recently, was known as Superior Networks, Inc. This latest venture marks a dramatic departure from the Company’s earlier business plan – an attempt to offer specialized training programs over the Internet.

The Company, which was formed in May 2000, planned to start out by providing driver training instruction over the Internet to senior citizens who were seeking to reduce their insurance costs by honing their driving skills. Superior Networks established an instructional website, called Superonlinetraining.com, and projected revenues based upon online advertising, course fees, and referral payments by insurance companies.

The Company had selected an unusual audience for its first Internet project; as a group, seniors do not utilize the Internet with the comfort or frequency of their younger counterparts. According to one study, as of the year 2000 only 13% of those over age 65 had Internet access, compared with 65% of those under age 30.

In any event, the Company’s Internet training business failed to develop, and Superonlinetraining.com (which no longer can be found on the Internet) never generated any revenues. As of August 2002, over eighteen months after it launched its website, the Company conceded that it lacked insufficient funds to commence development of its initial product. In fact, as of August 31, 2002, Superior Networks had no cash, did not anticipate generating any revenues in the near future, and had not identified any source for additional funding.

According to its Form 10-Q Report for the quarter ended August 31, 2002, failure to raise necessary funds in the immediate future would “at a minimum, prevent [Superior Networks] from fully developing [its] initial product and, in the worst case, cause [its] business to fail.” In the past, the Company’s auditors have expressed substantial doubt over its ability to continue as a going concern in view of its precarious financial position.

With no money in its accounts, no products in its pipeline, and no revenues on the horizon, what was the Company going to do?

French Fried

On October 15, 2002, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing plans to operate a French-based discount airline serving the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean, West Africa and North America. Superior Networks explained that it had entered into negotiations to acquire a 49% interest in AltitudePlus, S.A.S., a French charter airline operating under the name L’Air, that recently had been acquired in bankruptcy proceedings by a company called AeroPlus. The Company said it would change its name to L.Air Holding, Inc., to reflect the new business. (And no, our proofreaders have not fallen asleep. Although the French charter airline apparently spelled its name “L’Air,” Superior Networks changed its own corporate name to “L.Air Holding, and refers to itself as “L-Air Holding” in various press releases. To simplify matters, we will refer to the Company as “L-Air”).

How would the Company pay for its interest in the airline? Superior Networks said that it intended to issue 12 million shares of its common stock to AeroPlus, which would continue to own 51% of the airline. Indeed, on October 21st the Company announced that it had appointed two new members to its Board of Directors, including Jean Marie Gras, the current President of L’Air (the French charter carrier) and AeroPlus.

Exactly what was the Company getting for its 12 million shares? Neither the press releases nor the October 15th Form 8-K enumerated the assets of the acquired business. Was the Company obtaining anything more than the use of the name L-Air? The Form 8-K did not provide any financial statements, but promised that they would be filed within sixty days of the acquisition.

On October 29, 2002, the Company issued a press release declaring that it had completed the acquisition, and was engaged in negotiations to obtain interests in other airlines. At the time, the Company’s President, Alex Goldman, had this to say:

This is a great time to begin operating the first French ‘Low Cost’ long haul Airline around the Globe.

Mr. Goldman did not elaborate upon the basis for his belief. Considering the myriad problems facing the airline industry, it is unclear why this would be a “great time” for a struggling, unproven, and financially challenged company to enter the business.

The October 29th press release went on to say that the Company would operate Airbus A340-300 aircrafts, offer competitive prices, and provide a superior standard of service. There was no indication, however, that L-Air owned or leased any aircraft at the time, or that it actually operated a commercial air service to any destination. The Company, which at last report had no money and no prospect of imminent funding, did not say how it would pay the cost of leasing or purchasing aircraft, or the other anticipated expenses of operating an airline, like salaries for pilots, ground crews and other airline personnel.

Nor were such financial concerns addressed in a November 6, 2002 press release which claimed that L-Air had signed a letter of intent “with ILFC” to lease three Airbus A300-200 aircraft, valued at more than $200 million, to be delivered by January 2003. The press release did not identify IFLC, but those initials are used by the International Lease Finance Corporation, a subsidiary of American Financial Group.

The November 6, 2002 press release also stated that the Company was negotiating with Boeing, for an additional six aircraft that previously had been used by Singapore Airlines. It did not say whether L-Air planned to lease or purchase those aircraft, or explain who would provide the necessary funding for these acquisitions.

In any event, L-Air said it would commence operating flights to the French Caribbean during the coming winter. On December 2nd the Company reaffirmed that plan, announcing the opening of its online reservation site, and promising that travelers could reserve flights to three French Caribbean destinations commencing December 16th.

It was unclear, however, whether the Company intended to open its reservation system on December 16th or commence flights on that date. Since the Company did not expect any aircraft to become available before January 2003, it seemed unlikely that flights could begin before that time. L-Air reinforced that notion in the December 2nd press release, stating that it would “be operational very soon,” but declining to specify any date.

L-Air also said that it was about to initiate an advertising campaign “worth $500,000” in major French cities. The Company, which still had not explained how the airline would be funded, did not say how it planned to pay for the advertising effort.

The December 2nd press release said that the Company expected to add additional destinations, including cities in India and Canada, once it had obtained necessary clearances and licenses. It did not state whether it had received clearance from any city – including those in the French Caribbean - or whether it had secured landing slots at any airport.

And where were the financial statements that the Company promised to file within sixty days of the acquisition? The Company had declared the transaction completed on October 29, 2002. As the calendar turned from December 2002 to January 2003, audited financial statements had yet to be filed with the SEC.

The answers to those questions would never come. Instead, on February 5, 2003 the Company disclosed that it had reversed the acquisition due to “administrative and judicial complications” resulting from “the lack of cooperation of the French Civil Aviation Authorities for the re-issuance of the Air Transport Certificate of L-Air in Lyon-France.”

The Company would not be flying L-Air after all.

But that didn’t mean the Company had abandoned its desire to operate an airline. According to L-Air’s President Alex Goldman, the Company was engaged in the final stages of negotiations to acquire a substantial interest in another European airline business.

Was this venture any more likely to take off? As we will see in Part II of this series, it was not long before the press releases were flying.

©2003 Stock Patrol.com. All rights reserved.

WE'RE BACK ON PATROL



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/22/2003 3:52:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Mary, i think they got JM Message 18615162



To: mmmary who wrote (83248)2/22/2003 5:46:03 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Does your Company need Corporate Exposure? DDStockPicks.com Is Proud to bring you:

World Transport Authority Inc

ddstockpicks.com

===========================================

Founder of low-cost vehicle company arrested

By Gail Appleson

NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - The founder of World Transport Authority Inc. <WTAI.OB>, a company that sells licenses to build a low-cost utility vehicle, was arrested on Friday for allegedly causing the company to lie about its expected sales.

Douglas Norman, 61, a Canadian citizen who lives in El Cajon, California, was indicted for allegedly scheming to boost the company's share price in 2000 and 2001 and then selling his holdings for more than $1.6 million. The indictment was unsealed on Friday in Manhattan federal court.

Norman, who was arrested at his home, is charged with one count of securities fraud. If convicted, he could face a maximum prison sentence of 10 years and a $1 million fine.

Also on Friday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a related civil suit against Norman accusing him of a carrying out a "campaign of deception." The suit seeks a court order forcing him to repay the illegal profits and barring him from acting as an officer or director of any publicly traded company. It also seeks unspecified penalties.

Neither Norman nor a spokesman for the company could immediately be reached for comment.

World Transport Authority, located in El Cajon, California, sells licenses for the manufacture of the low-cost WorldStar utility vehicle.

Federal authorities said Norman is the self-described founder of the company and the controlling stockholder. Both the civil and criminal cases said he is the vice president of international sales, and a company employee confirmed that he still holds that title.

WTA's Web site states that the WorldStar vehicle costs less than $7,000, has fewer than 500 moving parts and runs on three types of fuels. It says the company "provides the capability for emerging nations throughout the world to be automobile and truck producing countries."

Authorities said WTA's core business is promoting the sale of the vehicle and a system to make it. They said the company's literature claims that a "micro-factory" to make the cars can be built in about 90 days.

To carry out its business, the company sells "master licenses" that gives the licensee an exclusive marketing territory, typically covering one or two countries or a geographic region.

The indictment alleged that Norman schemed to inflate WTA's stock price by authorizing the company to issue a series of false press releases and by paying a consultant to post misleading statements on Internet message boards about the company's activities and expected WorldStar and license sales.

Norman knew that WTA faced substantial obstacles in making money from WorldStar sales as the vehicle was not ready for production at the time of the releases and postings, the indictment charged.

The WorldStar vehicle also had not received government approval for production or sale in the countries where production was to occur, according to the charges.

The indictment charged that the false statements convinced numerous investors to buy WTA common stock and that some of them bought their shares directly from Norman. He then sold large amounts of the stock, reaping more than $1 million in illegal profits, it said.

02/21/03 16:53 ET