Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paul_philp who wrote (75048)	2/17/2003 11:22:04 PM
From: HH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction isnt the model in any case. Our destruction cant be contemplated with the anything but a full wartime arsenal of nuke missiles. Terrorism will gnaw at us and slowly eat away our liberties. Terrorist friendly States will draw our wrath. Perhaps we have embarked on our massive struggle to counteract terrorism which, as President Bush described will involve some swamp draining. Iraq is just the first. Good God, imagine the french when we next target Iran, then Syria or Nrth Korea. The french become quickly irrelevant. Bush was right, you either with us or for the terrorist. At some point, we will indeed develope an alliance of the willing. Hopefully, there will be a positive momentum gained after each succesful campaign. Everything points to the need for Iraq campaign being a slam dunk, unmitigated success.....post Saddam ! HH