SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8993)2/18/2003 12:31:22 PM
From: MSIRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Jack says "OR you could form a group to tackle the problem"

Raising taxes on any particular demographic is a failed premise, if you believe taxes are too high already, and that gov't expenditures are out of control.

Have you looked at (a)what you really pay in taxes, and (b)what they go for?

The GDP is 40% gov't.
Now, is 40% of your life really dependent on gov't services?

You are apparently taking the gov't POV, that more taxes will solve problems, and it's just a question of who can be made to pay.

It's a practical question - how can gov't best preserve the "American Way of Life" as we each define it. Other than being a bellicose SOB internationally, TR about had it right, regulating clear business abuses, preserving the environment, maintaining an open gov't, and encouraging participation.

If you are serious you should do what I and many others have done, run for office yourself or support anyone you can find who has their head screwed on straight. Without that community dialog, it ends up being the kind of gov't locally that we have in Washington, i.e., a pure tyranny of the insiders.

You'll find your biggest obstacle is media control by incumbants, and the only answer is grass-roots organizing like Jarvis, Ventura and Paul Wellstone, door-to-door. I encourage you to consider that. In '91 I sold a major property to get involved in politics, and I'm glad I did. You're the kind of person I would contribute to, if it got more people involved.

FWIW



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (8993)2/18/2003 3:01:54 PM
From: David JonesRespond to of 306849
 
...I think the best hope is a legal challenge on the basis of age discrimination....

Lizzie; am I missing the point? Just what does prop 13 have to do with a persons age?